Objectives To validate a standardized MRI scoring system, tracheal invasion score (T-score) and vascular invasion score (V-score) against CT for detecting tracheal and major-vessel invasion in esophageal cancer, based on imaging obtained after neoadjuvant therapy. Materials and methods Twenty-six patients (mean age 65 years) who underwent both MRI and CT after preoperative therapy and prior to esophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists independently assigned T- and V-scores on MRI and CT-based T-stage (12th Japanese Classification). Diagnostic performance was measured by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and κ for inter-reader agreement. Patient-level bootstrap resampling (2000 iterations) compared the combined MRI score—defined as max (T, V)—with CT. Results MRI yielded higher AUCs than CT for tracheal invasion (0.943–0.990 vs. 0.529–0.706) and vascular invasion (0.878 for both readers). MRI achieved substantial-to-almost-perfect agreement (κ = 0.771–1.000), whereas CT was only moderate (κ = 0.369–0.487). Bootstrap analysis confirmed superior discrimination of the combined MRI score: ΔAUC + 0.19 (–0.05–0.43, p = 0.11) for Reader A and +0.38 (0.07–0.66, p = 0.02) for Reader B. Conclusion A combined MRI T/V-score provides better accuracy and inter-reader reliability than CT for evaluating critical local invasion, even after preoperative therapy, supporting routine integration of MRI when CT findings are equivocal. Key Points <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> Determine whether a standardized MRI scoring system for tracheal and vascular invasion improves diagnostic accuracy compared with contrast‑enhanced CT in esophageal cancer. <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> MRI outperforms CT in detecting tracheal and vascular invasion, with higher specificity and superior inter-reader agreement using standardized scoring criteria. <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> Standardized MRI scoring improves staging accuracy in suspected T4 esophageal cancer, aiding surgical decision-making and helping to avoid unnecessary surgery in inoperable patients as well as incomplete (R1/R2) resections. Graphical Abstract

MRI outperforms CT for tracheal and vascular invasion staging in esophageal cancer

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2025年10月25日

查看全文

Yumiko Kono,
Takashi Harino,
Shintaro Yamamoto,
Ryo Ogasawara,
Kohiro Akita,
Makoto Yamasaki,
Noboru Tanigawa

摘要

Objectives

To validate a standardized MRI scoring system, tracheal invasion score (T-score) and vascular invasion score (V-score) against CT for detecting tracheal and major-vessel invasion in esophageal cancer, based on imaging obtained after neoadjuvant therapy.

Materials and methods

Twenty-six patients (mean age 65 years) who underwent both MRI and CT after preoperative therapy and prior to esophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists independently assigned T- and V-scores on MRI and CT-based T-stage (12th Japanese Classification). Diagnostic performance was measured by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and κ for inter-reader agreement. Patient-level bootstrap resampling (2000 iterations) compared the combined MRI score—defined as max (T, V)—with CT.

Results

MRI yielded higher AUCs than CT for tracheal invasion (0.943–0.990 vs. 0.529–0.706) and vascular invasion (0.878 for both readers). MRI achieved substantial-to-almost-perfect agreement (κ = 0.771–1.000), whereas CT was only moderate (κ = 0.369–0.487). Bootstrap analysis confirmed superior discrimination of the combined MRI score: ΔAUC + 0.19 (–0.05–0.43, p = 0.11) for Reader A and +0.38 (0.07–0.66, p = 0.02) for Reader B.

Conclusion

A combined MRI T/V-score provides better accuracy and inter-reader reliability than CT for evaluating critical local invasion, even after preoperative therapy, supporting routine integration of MRI when CT findings are equivocal.

Key Points

Question Determine whether a standardized MRI scoring system for tracheal and vascular invasion improves diagnostic accuracy compared with contrast‑enhanced CT in esophageal cancer.

Findings MRI outperforms CT in detecting tracheal and vascular invasion, with higher specificity and superior inter-reader agreement using standardized scoring criteria.

Clinical relevance Standardized MRI scoring improves staging accuracy in suspected T4 esophageal cancer, aiding surgical decision-making and helping to avoid unnecessary surgery in inoperable patients as well as incomplete (R1/R2) resections.

Graphical Abstract