Objectives <p>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) pressure measurements during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) are the gold standard for assessing vessel-specific ischemia. Artificial intelligence has emerged to compute FFR based on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images (CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub>). We assessed a CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub> deep learning model for the prediction of vessel-specific ischemia compared to invasive FFR/iFR measurements.</p> Materials and methods <p>We retrospectively selected 322 vessels from 275 patients at two centers who underwent CCTA and invasive FFR and/or iFR measurements during ICA within three months. A junior and senior radiologist at each center supervised vessel centerline-building to generate curvilinear reformats that were processed for CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub> binary outcomes (≤ 0.80 or &gt; 0.80) prediction. Reliability for CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub> outcomes based on radiologists’ supervision was assessed with Cohen’s <i>κ</i>. Diagnostic values of CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub> were calculated using invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 (<i>n</i> = 224) and invasive iFR ≤ 0.89 (<i>n</i> = 238) as the gold standard. A multinomial logistic regression model, including all false-positive and false-negative cases, assessed the impact of patient- and CCTA-related factors on diagnostic values of CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub>.</p> Results <p>Concordance for CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub> binary outcomes was substantial (<i>κ</i> = 0.725,<i> p</i> &lt; 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub> in predicting vessel-specific ischemia on a per-vessel analysis, based on senior radiologists’ evaluations, were 85% (58/68) and 91% (78/86), 82% (128/156) and 78% (119/152), 67% (58/86) and 70% (78/111), 93% (128/138) and 94% (119/127), and 83% (186/224) and 83% (197/238), respectively. Coronary calcifications significantly reduced the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; OR, 1.002; 95% CI 1.001–1.003).</p> Conclusion <p>CT-FFR<sub>AI</sub> demonstrates high diagnostic performance in predicting vessel-specific coronary ischemia compared to invasive FFR and iFR. Coronary calcifications negatively affect specificity, suggesting that further improvements in spatial resolution could enhance accuracy.</p> Key Points <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> <i>How accurately can a new deep learning model (CT-FFR</i><sub><i>AI</i></sub>) <i>assess vessel-specific ischemia from CCTA non-invasively compared to two validated pressure measurements during invasive coronary angiography?</i></p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> <i>CT-FFR</i><sub><i>AI</i></sub> <i>achieved high diagnostic accuracy in predicting vessel-specific ischemia, with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, independent of scanner type and radiologists’ experience</i>.</p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> <i>CT-FFR</i><sub><i>AI</i></sub> <i>provides a non-invasive alternative to Fractional Flow Reserve and instantaneous wave-Free Ratio measurements during invasive coronary angiography for detecting vessel-specific ischemia, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures, lowering healthcare costs, and improving patient safety</i>.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Diagnostic performance of a coronary CT angiography-based deep learning model for the prediction of vessel-specific ischemia

  • Benjamin Peters,
  • Rolf Symons,
  • Sanad Oulkadi,
  • Annelies Van Breda,
  • Yoann Bataille,
  • Peter Kayaert,
  • Willem Dewilde,
  • Kenneth De Wilder,
  • Wouter M. A. Franssen,
  • Alain Nchimi,
  • Olivier Ghekiere

摘要

Objectives

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) pressure measurements during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) are the gold standard for assessing vessel-specific ischemia. Artificial intelligence has emerged to compute FFR based on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images (CT-FFRAI). We assessed a CT-FFRAI deep learning model for the prediction of vessel-specific ischemia compared to invasive FFR/iFR measurements.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively selected 322 vessels from 275 patients at two centers who underwent CCTA and invasive FFR and/or iFR measurements during ICA within three months. A junior and senior radiologist at each center supervised vessel centerline-building to generate curvilinear reformats that were processed for CT-FFRAI binary outcomes (≤ 0.80 or > 0.80) prediction. Reliability for CT-FFRAI outcomes based on radiologists’ supervision was assessed with Cohen’s κ. Diagnostic values of CT-FFRAI were calculated using invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 (n = 224) and invasive iFR ≤ 0.89 (n = 238) as the gold standard. A multinomial logistic regression model, including all false-positive and false-negative cases, assessed the impact of patient- and CCTA-related factors on diagnostic values of CT-FFRAI.

Results

Concordance for CT-FFRAI binary outcomes was substantial (κ = 0.725, p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFRAI in predicting vessel-specific ischemia on a per-vessel analysis, based on senior radiologists’ evaluations, were 85% (58/68) and 91% (78/86), 82% (128/156) and 78% (119/152), 67% (58/86) and 70% (78/111), 93% (128/138) and 94% (119/127), and 83% (186/224) and 83% (197/238), respectively. Coronary calcifications significantly reduced the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFRAI (p < 0.001; OR, 1.002; 95% CI 1.001–1.003).

Conclusion

CT-FFRAI demonstrates high diagnostic performance in predicting vessel-specific coronary ischemia compared to invasive FFR and iFR. Coronary calcifications negatively affect specificity, suggesting that further improvements in spatial resolution could enhance accuracy.

Key Points

Question How accurately can a new deep learning model (CT-FFRAI) assess vessel-specific ischemia from CCTA non-invasively compared to two validated pressure measurements during invasive coronary angiography?

Findings CT-FFRAI achieved high diagnostic accuracy in predicting vessel-specific ischemia, with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, independent of scanner type and radiologists’ experience.

Clinical relevance CT-FFRAI provides a non-invasive alternative to Fractional Flow Reserve and instantaneous wave-Free Ratio measurements during invasive coronary angiography for detecting vessel-specific ischemia, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures, lowering healthcare costs, and improving patient safety.

Graphical Abstract