Scholarlink

Abstract <p>Every physician seeks to do more good than harm. A surgeon operates with the expectation that the benefits of the operation outweigh the risks associated with the surgery, leaving the patient in a better condition than before the procedure. Radiologists provide enormous benefits for patients—identifying diseases that could not otherwise be diagnosed or staging disease severity to allow for the most appropriate treatments to be undertaken. However, like any intervention, radiological studies are associated with risks; ionizing radiation may not be as apparent as a surgical site infection to patients or even other healthcare providers, but it carries inherent and cumulative risk and portends real hazard for patients. This article explores the responsibility of radiologists to champion appropriate imaging selection through rigorous justification of studies and protocol optimization when imaging is indicated.</p> Key Points <p><UnorderedList Mark="Bullet"> <ItemContent> <p><i>Irradiating patients for CT imaging provides tremendous diagnostic value, but is associated with an increased risk of cancer.</i></p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p><i>The risk of CT-associated malignancies should be discussed with patients in an understandable way, considering individual- and population-level hazard.</i></p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p><i>Strict application of the ALARA principle allows for maximizing benefits from imaging studies while minimizing harm.</i></p> </ItemContent> </UnorderedList></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Balancing patients’ benefits and risks in computed tomography: a European Society of Radiology ‘EuroSafe Imaging’ viewpoint

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月9日

查看全文
  • John Damilakis,
  • Claudio Granata,
  • Elmar Kotter,
  • Boris Brkljacic

摘要

Abstract

Every physician seeks to do more good than harm. A surgeon operates with the expectation that the benefits of the operation outweigh the risks associated with the surgery, leaving the patient in a better condition than before the procedure. Radiologists provide enormous benefits for patients—identifying diseases that could not otherwise be diagnosed or staging disease severity to allow for the most appropriate treatments to be undertaken. However, like any intervention, radiological studies are associated with risks; ionizing radiation may not be as apparent as a surgical site infection to patients or even other healthcare providers, but it carries inherent and cumulative risk and portends real hazard for patients. This article explores the responsibility of radiologists to champion appropriate imaging selection through rigorous justification of studies and protocol optimization when imaging is indicated.

Key Points

Irradiating patients for CT imaging provides tremendous diagnostic value, but is associated with an increased risk of cancer.

The risk of CT-associated malignancies should be discussed with patients in an understandable way, considering individual- and population-level hazard.

Strict application of the ALARA principle allows for maximizing benefits from imaging studies while minimizing harm.