Objectives <p>Focal consolidation on CT may be inflammatory or malignant, and PET-CT imaging is rarely discriminatory. Furthermore, consolidation may demonstrate spontaneous resolution obviating the need for PET-CT imaging. This retrospective study sought to assess the safety and cost-effectiveness of short-interval 6-week follow-up CT for consolidation in a lung cancer screening programme.</p> Methods <p>Between January 2019 and January 2024, participants in a regional lung cancer screening programme with focal indeterminate consolidation underwent a 6-week repeat CT rather than immediate PET-CT and invasive investigation. The proportion of participants with non-resolving consolidation, the risk of malignancy in consolidation at a 6-week follow-up, and the risk of upstaging over a 6-week delay were determined. Cost savings were estimated from National Health Service reference costs.</p> Results <p>In 10,247 CT studies, focal indeterminate consolidation was detected in 113 participants (1.1%) (mean age 68 years, range 55–76, 65 males). Consolidation spontaneously resolved at 6 weeks in 63/110 (57%) who attended follow-up; 14/110 (12.7%) participants had malignancy; no patients upstaged during follow-up. An estimated cost saving of £47,600/10,000 screening CTs performed might be obtained through a conservative approach of short-term interval CT, rather than immediate PET-CT and further investigation.</p> Conclusion <p>Early repeat CT avoids PET-CT in more than half of patients with consolidation and can be utilised to reduce over-investigation of screen-detected consolidation, which may demonstrate spontaneous resolution.</p> Key Points <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> <i>Is short-term interval follow-up CT in lung cancer screening a safe and cost-effective approach to managing indeterminate (inflammatory or malignant) consolidation?</i></p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> <i>Short-interval CT imaging demonstrates spontaneous resolution of consolidation in over 50% participants in this study, whilst persistent consolidation has a high likelihood of malignancy.</i></p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> <i>Short-interval CT did not result in upstaging of malignancy and&#xa0;therefore can be considered a safe strategy to prevent the over-investigation of screen-detected consolidation, supporting recent European and American screening recommendations.</i></p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of the safety of short-term follow-up CT for the management of consolidation in lung cancer screening

  • Emily C. Bartlett,
  • Ley Chan,
  • Justin Garner,
  • Sujal R. Desai,
  • Samuel V. Kemp,
  • Simon Padley,
  • Bhavin Rawal,
  • Carole A. Ridge,
  • James Addis,
  • Anand Devaraj

摘要

Objectives

Focal consolidation on CT may be inflammatory or malignant, and PET-CT imaging is rarely discriminatory. Furthermore, consolidation may demonstrate spontaneous resolution obviating the need for PET-CT imaging. This retrospective study sought to assess the safety and cost-effectiveness of short-interval 6-week follow-up CT for consolidation in a lung cancer screening programme.

Methods

Between January 2019 and January 2024, participants in a regional lung cancer screening programme with focal indeterminate consolidation underwent a 6-week repeat CT rather than immediate PET-CT and invasive investigation. The proportion of participants with non-resolving consolidation, the risk of malignancy in consolidation at a 6-week follow-up, and the risk of upstaging over a 6-week delay were determined. Cost savings were estimated from National Health Service reference costs.

Results

In 10,247 CT studies, focal indeterminate consolidation was detected in 113 participants (1.1%) (mean age 68 years, range 55–76, 65 males). Consolidation spontaneously resolved at 6 weeks in 63/110 (57%) who attended follow-up; 14/110 (12.7%) participants had malignancy; no patients upstaged during follow-up. An estimated cost saving of £47,600/10,000 screening CTs performed might be obtained through a conservative approach of short-term interval CT, rather than immediate PET-CT and further investigation.

Conclusion

Early repeat CT avoids PET-CT in more than half of patients with consolidation and can be utilised to reduce over-investigation of screen-detected consolidation, which may demonstrate spontaneous resolution.

Key Points

Question Is short-term interval follow-up CT in lung cancer screening a safe and cost-effective approach to managing indeterminate (inflammatory or malignant) consolidation?

Findings Short-interval CT imaging demonstrates spontaneous resolution of consolidation in over 50% participants in this study, whilst persistent consolidation has a high likelihood of malignancy.

Clinical relevance Short-interval CT did not result in upstaging of malignancy and therefore can be considered a safe strategy to prevent the over-investigation of screen-detected consolidation, supporting recent European and American screening recommendations.

Graphical Abstract