Objectives This study aimed to validate the agreement and diagnostic performance of a deep-learning-based coronary artery calcium scoring (DL-CACS) system for ECG-gated and non-gated low-dose chest CT (LDCT) across multivendor datasets. Materials and methods In this retrospective study, datasets from Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH, 652 paired ECG-gated and non-gated CT scans) and the Stanford public dataset (425 ECG-gated and 199 non-gated CT scans) were analyzed. Agreement metrics included intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of determination (R²), and categorical agreement (κ). Diagnostic performance was assessed using categorical accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results DL-CACS demonstrated excellent performance for ECG-gated CT in both datasets (SNUH: R² = 0.995, ICC = 0.997, κ = 0.97, AUROC = 0.99; Stanford: R² = 0.989, ICC = 0.990, κ = 0.97, AUROC = 0.99). For non-gated CT using manual LDCT CAC scores as a reference, performance was similarly high (R² = 0.988, ICC = 0.994, κ = 0.96, AUROC = 0.98–0.99). When using ECG-gated CT scores as the reference, performance for non-gated CT was slightly lower but remained robust (SNUH: R² = 0.948, ICC = 0.968, κ = 0.88, AUROC = 0.98–0.99; Stanford: R² = 0.949, ICC = 0.948, κ = 0.71, AUROC = 0.89–0.98). Conclusion DL-CACS provides a reliable and automated solution for CACS, potentially reducing workload while maintaining robust performance in both ECG-gated and non-gated CT settings. Key Points <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> How accurate and reliable is deep-learning-based coronary artery calcium scoring (DL-CACS) in ECG-gated CT and non-gated low-dose chest CT (LDCT) across multivendor datasets? <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> DL-CACS showed near-perfect performance for ECG-gated CT. For non-gated LDCT, performance was excellent using manual scores as the reference and lower but reliable when using ECG-gated CT scores. <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> DL-CACS provides a reliable and automated solution for CACS, potentially reducing workload and improving diagnostic workflow. It supports cardiovascular risk stratification and broader clinical adoption, especially in settings where ECG-gated CT is unavailable. Graphical Abstract

Performance of fully automated deep-learning-based coronary artery calcium scoring in ECG-gated calcium CT and non-gated low-dose chest CT

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2025年5月10日

查看全文

Sihwan Kim,
Eun-Ah Park,
Chulkyun Ahn,
Baren Jeong,
Yoon Seong Lee,
Whal Lee,
Jong Hyo Kim

摘要

Objectives

This study aimed to validate the agreement and diagnostic performance of a deep-learning-based coronary artery calcium scoring (DL-CACS) system for ECG-gated and non-gated low-dose chest CT (LDCT) across multivendor datasets.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, datasets from Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH, 652 paired ECG-gated and non-gated CT scans) and the Stanford public dataset (425 ECG-gated and 199 non-gated CT scans) were analyzed. Agreement metrics included intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of determination (R²), and categorical agreement (κ). Diagnostic performance was assessed using categorical accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results

DL-CACS demonstrated excellent performance for ECG-gated CT in both datasets (SNUH: R² = 0.995, ICC = 0.997, κ = 0.97, AUROC = 0.99; Stanford: R² = 0.989, ICC = 0.990, κ = 0.97, AUROC = 0.99). For non-gated CT using manual LDCT CAC scores as a reference, performance was similarly high (R² = 0.988, ICC = 0.994, κ = 0.96, AUROC = 0.98–0.99). When using ECG-gated CT scores as the reference, performance for non-gated CT was slightly lower but remained robust (SNUH: R² = 0.948, ICC = 0.968, κ = 0.88, AUROC = 0.98–0.99; Stanford: R² = 0.949, ICC = 0.948, κ = 0.71, AUROC = 0.89–0.98).

Conclusion

DL-CACS provides a reliable and automated solution for CACS, potentially reducing workload while maintaining robust performance in both ECG-gated and non-gated CT settings.

Key Points

Question How accurate and reliable is deep-learning-based coronary artery calcium scoring (DL-CACS) in ECG-gated CT and non-gated low-dose chest CT (LDCT) across multivendor datasets?

Findings DL-CACS showed near-perfect performance for ECG-gated CT. For non-gated LDCT, performance was excellent using manual scores as the reference and lower but reliable when using ECG-gated CT scores.

Clinical relevance DL-CACS provides a reliable and automated solution for CACS, potentially reducing workload and improving diagnostic workflow. It supports cardiovascular risk stratification and broader clinical adoption, especially in settings where ECG-gated CT is unavailable.

Graphical Abstract