Abstract The medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) score is used for visual assessment of MTA on radiological images in suspected neurodegenerative dementia. Although volumetric tools are available, many radiologists still use visual scoring and compare to reference images. Numerous such example images are found online on educational websites and in scientific articles. The aim of this study was to compare congruencies between MTA scores of publicly available sample images with normalized heights and areas of relevant brain structures, measured in the same images. Method Systematic online searches yielded 148 individual sample images. The height and area of relevant brain structures were manually delineated, normalized, and compared with regard to the displayed MTA score. Results The normalized heights and areas showed correlation with MTA but with considerable overlap between adjacent scores, especially when comparing heights. Also, displays of the MTA score were more consistent with the area of the temporal horn than with the hippocampal area. Conclusion There is considerable overlap between adjacent scores in publicly available pictorial displays of the MTA grading system. Insufficient congruency leads to confusion and reduces inter-rater reliability. We also found that publicly available images are more consistent with temporal horn area than the hippocampus, which means that ventricular size may bias the grading. This can impede relevant differential diagnostics, especially regarding normal pressure hydrocephalus. Here, we present lectotype images selected specifically with regard to the hippocampal area. Key Points <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> Overlap between publicly available example images of medial temporal atrophy causes confusion and limits reliability. <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> Available images are more consistent with ventricular dilatation than hippocampal atrophy; this article provides lectotype images selected specifically regarding the hippocampal area. <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> Visual assessment of medial temporal atrophy is used daily and worldwide in radiological examinations regarding suspected dementia. In clinical routine, many radiologists experience uncertainty, and hydrocephalus is often overlooked. This may be caused by insufficient congruency between educational sample images. Graphical Abstract

Congruency between publicly available pictorial displays of medial temporal lobe atrophy

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2025年4月3日

查看全文

Felicia Forseni Flodin,
Sven Haller,
Leo Poom,
David Fällmar

摘要

Abstract

The medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) score is used for visual assessment of MTA on radiological images in suspected neurodegenerative dementia. Although volumetric tools are available, many radiologists still use visual scoring and compare to reference images. Numerous such example images are found online on educational websites and in scientific articles. The aim of this study was to compare congruencies between MTA scores of publicly available sample images with normalized heights and areas of relevant brain structures, measured in the same images.

Method

Systematic online searches yielded 148 individual sample images. The height and area of relevant brain structures were manually delineated, normalized, and compared with regard to the displayed MTA score.

Results

The normalized heights and areas showed correlation with MTA but with considerable overlap between adjacent scores, especially when comparing heights. Also, displays of the MTA score were more consistent with the area of the temporal horn than with the hippocampal area.

Conclusion

There is considerable overlap between adjacent scores in publicly available pictorial displays of the MTA grading system. Insufficient congruency leads to confusion and reduces inter-rater reliability. We also found that publicly available images are more consistent with temporal horn area than the hippocampus, which means that ventricular size may bias the grading. This can impede relevant differential diagnostics, especially regarding normal pressure hydrocephalus. Here, we present lectotype images selected specifically with regard to the hippocampal area.

Key Points

Question Overlap between publicly available example images of medial temporal atrophy causes confusion and limits reliability.

Findings Available images are more consistent with ventricular dilatation than hippocampal atrophy; this article provides lectotype images selected specifically regarding the hippocampal area.

Clinical relevance Visual assessment of medial temporal atrophy is used daily and worldwide in radiological examinations regarding suspected dementia. In clinical routine, many radiologists experience uncertainty, and hydrocephalus is often overlooked. This may be caused by insufficient congruency between educational sample images.

Graphical Abstract