Objectives <p>To evaluate the performance of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) with LI-RADS (LI-RADS + AFP) on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 3.0 cm and predicting post-surgical patient outcomes, compared to LI-RADS v2018.</p> Methods <p>Patients with hepatic observations ≤ 3.0 cm who underwent preoperative gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. In LI-RADS + AFP, LR-4 (probably-HCC), LR-M (probably or definitely-malignant but not HCC specific), or LR-TIV (definite-tumor-in-vein) by LI-RADS v2018 was upgraded to LR-5 (definitely-HCC) if they met AFP criteria based on three different cut-offs (≥ 20, ≥ 200, ≥ 400 ng/mL). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 and LI-RADS + AFP LR-5 were compared using generalized estimating equations. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups (LR-4/5 vs. LR-M) of LI-RADS v2018 and LI-RADS + AFP were compared using log-rank tests.</p> Results <p>In 520 observations from 414 patients (mean age, 60 ± 9 years; 328 men), LI-RADS + AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL (LI-RADS + AFP20) showed the highest accuracy among the three cut-offs. Compared to LI-RADS v2018, LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significantly higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC (79.9% [95% confidence interval, 75.7–83.6] vs. 71.8% [67.2–76.1], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and accuracy (82.7% [79.2–85.9] vs. 76.9% [73.1–80.5], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) without difference in specificity (93.5% [87.1–97.4] vs. 96.3% [90.8–99.0], <i>p</i> = 0.083). Unlike LI-RADS v2018, showing no difference in RFS between LR-4/5 and LR-M (50.6 vs. 42.6 months; <i>p</i> = 0.078), LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significant differences in RFS (50.6 vs. 35.0 months; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and OS (67.6 vs. 54.8 months, <i>p</i> = 0.008).</p> Conclusion <p>Combining AFP and LI-RADS v2018 resulted in better diagnostic performance and superior post-surgical prognostication compared to LI-RADS v2018 alone.</p> Key Points <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis><i> Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a commonly used tumor biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there are no studies that applied serum AFP in CT/MRI LI-RADS.</i></p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis><i> Combining serum AFP and LI-RADS v2018 had better diagnostic performance for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm and superior post-surgical prognostication than LI-RADS v2018 alone.</i></p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis><i> Integrating serum AFP with LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI improves the diagnosis and prognostication of HCC patients. These findings provide clinicians with a more robust diagnostic and prognostic framework for managing patients with HCC ≤ 3.0 cm.</i></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effect of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein with LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and prognostication of hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Dong Hwan Kim,
  • Sang Hyun Choi,
  • Boyeon Koo,
  • Se Jin Choi,
  • Hyeon Ji Jang,
  • Subin Heo,
  • Jae Ho Byun,
  • Hyung Jin Won,
  • Yong Moon Shin

摘要

Objectives

To evaluate the performance of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) with LI-RADS (LI-RADS + AFP) on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 3.0 cm and predicting post-surgical patient outcomes, compared to LI-RADS v2018.

Methods

Patients with hepatic observations ≤ 3.0 cm who underwent preoperative gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. In LI-RADS + AFP, LR-4 (probably-HCC), LR-M (probably or definitely-malignant but not HCC specific), or LR-TIV (definite-tumor-in-vein) by LI-RADS v2018 was upgraded to LR-5 (definitely-HCC) if they met AFP criteria based on three different cut-offs (≥ 20, ≥ 200, ≥ 400 ng/mL). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 and LI-RADS + AFP LR-5 were compared using generalized estimating equations. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups (LR-4/5 vs. LR-M) of LI-RADS v2018 and LI-RADS + AFP were compared using log-rank tests.

Results

In 520 observations from 414 patients (mean age, 60 ± 9 years; 328 men), LI-RADS + AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL (LI-RADS + AFP20) showed the highest accuracy among the three cut-offs. Compared to LI-RADS v2018, LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significantly higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC (79.9% [95% confidence interval, 75.7–83.6] vs. 71.8% [67.2–76.1], p < 0.001) and accuracy (82.7% [79.2–85.9] vs. 76.9% [73.1–80.5], p < 0.001) without difference in specificity (93.5% [87.1–97.4] vs. 96.3% [90.8–99.0], p = 0.083). Unlike LI-RADS v2018, showing no difference in RFS between LR-4/5 and LR-M (50.6 vs. 42.6 months; p = 0.078), LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significant differences in RFS (50.6 vs. 35.0 months; p < 0.001) and OS (67.6 vs. 54.8 months, p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Combining AFP and LI-RADS v2018 resulted in better diagnostic performance and superior post-surgical prognostication compared to LI-RADS v2018 alone.

Key Points

Question Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a commonly used tumor biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there are no studies that applied serum AFP in CT/MRI LI-RADS.

Findings Combining serum AFP and LI-RADS v2018 had better diagnostic performance for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm and superior post-surgical prognostication than LI-RADS v2018 alone.

Clinical relevance Integrating serum AFP with LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI improves the diagnosis and prognostication of HCC patients. These findings provide clinicians with a more robust diagnostic and prognostic framework for managing patients with HCC ≤ 3.0 cm.