Objectives <p>To explore the reproducibility of the 1.5-T MR imaging (MRI)-based R2* method in measuring the liver iron concentration (LIC) across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques.</p> Materials and methods <p>We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases and identified studies that used the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method to measure the LIC. The original data were extracted from the selected studies. Reproducibility was assessed in terms of the ability to replicate the measured LIC with the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method across different scanning instruments, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. We used the scanner equipment, scan parameters, and postprocessing technique as random effects to determine whether the R2* values obtained in the different studies were significantly different after the effects of the measured LIC were excluded. The calibration curve that best fit the R2* value to the LIC was estimated via univariate regression.</p> Results <p>Twenty-one studies (1147 participants) were included. The seven studies (435 participants) in which the initial TE was ≤ 1.0 ms and the TE spacing was ≤ 1.4 ms did not have significant differences in the measured R2* value in pairwise comparisons (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Calibration of R2* to LIC was as follows: LIC (mg/g) = 0.042 + 2.85 × 10<sup>−2</sup> R2* (s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.79).</p> Conclusion <p>The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method in estimating LIC was reproducible across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques.</p> Key Points <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> <i>The R2* method is widely used to quantify LIC, but the reproducibility of R2*-based LIC estimation remains unknown</i>.</p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> <i>In scan sequences with an initial echo time (TE)</i> <i>≤</i> <i>1.0</i> <i>ms and a TE spacing</i> <i>≤</i> <i>1.4</i> <i>ms, the R2*-based LIC quantification at 1.5</i> <i>T achieved good reproducibility</i>.</p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> <i>The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method enables reproducible quantification of the LIC; its reproducibility spares patients from unnecessary trauma and economic burdens while promoting the extensive clinical dissemination of R2*-based LIC quantification methods</i>.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Reproducibility of liver iron concentration measured by R2* method based on 1.5-T MRI: a meta-analysis

  • Sue Cao,
  • Jie Zhang,
  • Chenyu Dong,
  • Yutao Que,
  • Xin Gao,
  • Ruomi Guo

摘要

Objectives

To explore the reproducibility of the 1.5-T MR imaging (MRI)-based R2* method in measuring the liver iron concentration (LIC) across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques.

Materials and methods

We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases and identified studies that used the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method to measure the LIC. The original data were extracted from the selected studies. Reproducibility was assessed in terms of the ability to replicate the measured LIC with the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method across different scanning instruments, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. We used the scanner equipment, scan parameters, and postprocessing technique as random effects to determine whether the R2* values obtained in the different studies were significantly different after the effects of the measured LIC were excluded. The calibration curve that best fit the R2* value to the LIC was estimated via univariate regression.

Results

Twenty-one studies (1147 participants) were included. The seven studies (435 participants) in which the initial TE was ≤ 1.0 ms and the TE spacing was ≤ 1.4 ms did not have significant differences in the measured R2* value in pairwise comparisons (p > 0.05). Calibration of R2* to LIC was as follows: LIC (mg/g) = 0.042 + 2.85 × 10−2 R2* (s1) (R2 = 0.79).

Conclusion

The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method in estimating LIC was reproducible across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques.

Key Points

Question The R2* method is widely used to quantify LIC, but the reproducibility of R2*-based LIC estimation remains unknown.

Findings In scan sequences with an initial echo time (TE)1.0ms and a TE spacing1.4ms, the R2*-based LIC quantification at 1.5T achieved good reproducibility.

Clinical relevance The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method enables reproducible quantification of the LIC; its reproducibility spares patients from unnecessary trauma and economic burdens while promoting the extensive clinical dissemination of R2*-based LIC quantification methods.

Graphical Abstract