Objectives <p>The use of deep learning models for quantitative measurements on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may reduce inter-reader variability and increase efficiency in clinical reporting. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of a recently updated deep learning model (CorEx-2.0) for quantifying coronary stenosis, compared separately with two expert CCTA readers as references.</p> Methods <p>This single-center retrospective study included 50 patients that underwent CCTA to rule out obstructive coronary artery disease between 2017-2022. Two expert CCTA readers and CorEx-2.0 independently assessed all 150 vessels using Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS). Inter-reader agreement analysis and diagnostic performance of CorEx-2.0, compared with each expert reader as references, were evaluated using percent agreement, Cohen’s kappa for the binary CAD-RADS classification (CAD-RADS 0-3 versus 4-5) at patient level, and linearly weighted kappa for the 6-group CAD-RADS classification at vessel level.</p> Results <p>Overall, 50 patients and 150 vessels were evaluated. Inter-reader agreement using the binary classification at patient level was 91.8% (45/49) with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.80. For the 6-group classification at vessel level, inter-reader agreement was 67.6% (100/148) with a linearly weighted kappa of 0.77. CorEx-2.0 showed 100% sensitivity for detecting CAD-RADS ≥ 4 and kappa values of 0.86 versus both readers using the binary classification at patient level. For the 6-group classification at vessel level, CorEx-2.0 demonstrated weighted kappa values of 0.71 versus reader 1 and 0.73 versus reader 2.</p> Conclusion <p>CorEx-2.0 identified all patients with severe stenosis (CAD-RADS ≥ 4) compared with expert readers and approached expert reader performance at vessel level (weighted kappa &gt; 0.70).</p> Key Points <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> <i>Can deep learning models improve objectivity in coronary stenosis grading and reporting as coronary CT angiography (CTA) workloads rise?</i></p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> <i>The deep learning model (CorEx-2.0) identified all patients with severe stenoses when compared with expert readers and approached expert reader performance at vessel level.</i></p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> <i>CorEx-2.0 is a reliable tool for identifying patients with severe stenoses (≥ 70%), underscoring the potential of using this deep learning model to prioritize coronary CTA reading by flagging patients at risk of severe obstructive coronary artery disease.</i></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Automated classification of coronary LEsions fRom coronary computed Tomography angiography scans with an updated deep learning model: ALERT study

  • Victor A. Verpalen,
  • Casper F. Coerkamp,
  • José P. S. Henriques,
  • Ivana Isgum,
  • R. Nils Planken

摘要

Objectives

The use of deep learning models for quantitative measurements on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may reduce inter-reader variability and increase efficiency in clinical reporting. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of a recently updated deep learning model (CorEx-2.0) for quantifying coronary stenosis, compared separately with two expert CCTA readers as references.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study included 50 patients that underwent CCTA to rule out obstructive coronary artery disease between 2017-2022. Two expert CCTA readers and CorEx-2.0 independently assessed all 150 vessels using Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS). Inter-reader agreement analysis and diagnostic performance of CorEx-2.0, compared with each expert reader as references, were evaluated using percent agreement, Cohen’s kappa for the binary CAD-RADS classification (CAD-RADS 0-3 versus 4-5) at patient level, and linearly weighted kappa for the 6-group CAD-RADS classification at vessel level.

Results

Overall, 50 patients and 150 vessels were evaluated. Inter-reader agreement using the binary classification at patient level was 91.8% (45/49) with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.80. For the 6-group classification at vessel level, inter-reader agreement was 67.6% (100/148) with a linearly weighted kappa of 0.77. CorEx-2.0 showed 100% sensitivity for detecting CAD-RADS ≥ 4 and kappa values of 0.86 versus both readers using the binary classification at patient level. For the 6-group classification at vessel level, CorEx-2.0 demonstrated weighted kappa values of 0.71 versus reader 1 and 0.73 versus reader 2.

Conclusion

CorEx-2.0 identified all patients with severe stenosis (CAD-RADS ≥ 4) compared with expert readers and approached expert reader performance at vessel level (weighted kappa > 0.70).

Key Points

Question Can deep learning models improve objectivity in coronary stenosis grading and reporting as coronary CT angiography (CTA) workloads rise?

Findings The deep learning model (CorEx-2.0) identified all patients with severe stenoses when compared with expert readers and approached expert reader performance at vessel level.

Clinical relevance CorEx-2.0 is a reliable tool for identifying patients with severe stenoses (≥ 70%), underscoring the potential of using this deep learning model to prioritize coronary CTA reading by flagging patients at risk of severe obstructive coronary artery disease.