Ovarian-Adnexal Imaging-Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound version 2019: a prospective validation and comparison to updated version (v2022) in pathologically confirmed adnexal masses

期刊论文
发表日期：

2024年11月28日

查看全文

Yassir Edrees Almalki,
Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha,
Mohamad Gamal Nada,
Maha Ibrahim Metwally,
Yasmin Ibrahim Libda,
Noha Yahia Ebaid,
Mohamed M. A. Zaitoun,
Nader E. M. Mahmoud,
Amgad M. Elsheikh,
Mohamed Hesham Saleh Saleh Radwan,
Mohamed I. Amin,
Elshaimaa Mohamed Mohamed,
Engy Fathy Tantawy,
Sameh Saber,
Walid Mosallam,
Housseini Mohamed Abdalla,
Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Mohamed Farag,
Tamer Mahmoud Dawoud,
Hamada M. Khater,
Diaa Bakry Eldib,
Jehan Ibrahim Altohamy,
Rasha Taha Abouelkheir,
Waseem M. El Gendy,
Sharifa Khalid Alduraibi,
Majed Saeed Alshahrani,
Safaa A. Ibrahim,
Ahmed M. Radwan,
Ahmed Ali Obaya,
Ahmed M. Abdelkhalik Basha,
Ahmed Mohamed El-Maghraby

摘要

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound v2019 in classifying adnexal masses (AMs) and compare the old and updated systems (v2022).

Patients and methods

This prospective study enrolled 977 consecutive women with suspected AMs from three institutions between January 2022 and December 2023. Ultrasound examinations were performed by three experienced radiologists who categorized AMs according to O-RADS ultrasound v2019. The same radiologists retrospectively reviewed the stored ultrasound images and provided the O-RADS ultrasound v2022 classification. Histopathology was used as the reference standard to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of the O-RADS versions in predicting malignant AMs. Inter-observer agreement (IOA) of the O-RADS scoring results was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa (κ) test.

Results

The final analysis included 803 women with 855 AMs (219 (25.6%) malignant and 636 (74.4%) benign). Both O-RADS versions demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.906 to 0.923 (v2019) and 0.919 to 0.936 (v2022). The updated v2022 showed a slightly higher accuracy (82.5–86.7% vs. 80.7–85.3%), sensitivity (93.6–95.0% vs. 92.2–94.1%), and specificity (78.1–84.1% vs. 76.1–82.9%) compared to v2019. The IOA for the overall O-RADS classification was perfect for both versions (κ = 0.96–0.97).

Conclusions

The O-RADS ultrasound classification system demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy and reliability in predicting malignant AMs, with the updated v2022 showing modest improvements.

Key Points

Question Accurate classification of adnexal masses is essential for management. Can updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability compared to v2019 in predicting malignancies?

Findings O-RADS ultrasound v2022 demonstrated slightly higher diagnostic accuracy for identifying malignant adnexal masses compared to v2019, reflecting modest improvements in risk stratification and clinical decision-making.

Clinical relevance The updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 provides improved risk stratification for adnexal masses, enhancing diagnostic confidence, supporting more precise clinical decision-making, and improving patient outcomes through timely intervention or tailored management strategies in ovarian cancer care.