错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Robustness of radiomics among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems: a texture phantom study

  • Lan Zhu,
  • Haipeng Dong,
  • Jing Sun,
  • Lingyun Wang,
  • Yue Xing,
  • Yangfan Hu,
  • Junjie Lu,
  • Jiarui Yang,
  • Jingshen Chu,
  • Chao Yan,
  • Fei Yuan,
  • Jingyu Zhong

摘要

Objectives

To evaluate the robustness of radiomics features among photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) systems.

Methods

A texture phantom consisting of twenty-eight materials was scanned with one PCD-CT and four DECT systems (dual-source, rapid kV-switching, dual-layer, and sequential scanning) at three dose levels twice. Thirty sets of virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV were reconstructed. Regions of interest were delineated for each material with a rigid registration. Ninety-three radiomics were extracted per PyRadiomics. The test-retest repeatability between repeated scans was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The intra-system reproducibility between dose levels, and inter-system reproducibility within the same dose level, were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-system variability among five scanners was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD).

Results

The test–retest repeatability analysis presented that 97.1% of features were repeatable between scan–rescans. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.945 ± 0.079 and 0.945 ± 0.079 for intra-system reproducibility, respectively, and 86.0% and 85.7% of features were with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90, respectively, between different dose levels. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.157 ± 0.174 and 0.157 ± 0.174 for inter-system reproducibility, respectively, and none of the features were with ICC > 0.90 or CCC > 0.90 within the same dose level. The inter-system variability suggested that 6.5% and 12.8% of features were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, respectively, among five CT systems.

Conclusion

The radiomics features were non-reproducible with significant variability in values among different CT techniques.

Clinical relevance statement

Radiomics features are non-reproducible with significant variability in values among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems, necessitating careful attention to improve the cross-system generalizability of radiomic features before implementation of radiomics analysis in clinical routine.

Key Points

CT radiomics stability should be guaranteed before the implementation in the clinical routine.

Radiomics robustness was on a low level among photon-counting detectors and dual-energy CT techniques.

Limited inter-system robustness of radiomic features may impact the generalizability of models.