Prospective validation of the role of PET/CT in detecting disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2024年3月9日

查看全文

Elaine Yuen Phin Lee,
Philip Pun Ching Ip,
Ka Yu Tse,
Keith Wan Hang Chiu,
Mandy Man Yee Chu,
Yu Ka Chai,
Philip Yuguang Wu,
Jessica Yun Pui Law,
Shuk Tak Kwok,
Wan Kam Chiu,
Hextan Yuen Sheung Ngan

摘要

Objectives

The study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracies of 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in advanced ovarian cancer (OC).

Materials and methods

This study consisted historical observational cohort and prospective validation cohort. Patients with newly diagnosed stage III–IV OC scheduled for NACT were recruited, with imaging performed after three to six cycles of NACT before interval debulking surgery. Nineteen regions in the abdominopelvic cavity were scored for the presence and absence of disease, referenced to the intra-operative findings or histological specimens. Diagnostic metrics were compared using McNemar’s test.

Results

In the historical cohort (23 patients, age 58 ± 13), 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET had an overall accuracy (Acc) 82%, sensitivity (Sen) 38%, specificity (Spe) 97%, positive predictive value (PPV) 79% and negative predictive value (NPV) 82%; ceCT had an overall Acc 86%, Sen 64%, Spe 93%, PPV 75% and NPV 89%. In the prospective cohort (46 patients, age 59 ± 9), 2-[¹⁸F] FDG PET had an overall Acc 87%, Sen 48%, Spe 98%, PPV 84% and NPV 88%; ceCT had an overall Acc 89%, Sen 66%, Spe 95%, PPV 77% and NPV 91%. No significant difference was demonstrated between the two imaging modalities (p > 0.05). High false-negative rates were observed in the right subdiaphragmatic space, omentum, bowel mesentery and serosa. High omental metabolic uptake after NACT was associated with histological non-responders (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT had no additional value over ceCT with comparable diagnostic accuracy in detecting disease after NACT in advanced OC.

Clinical relevance statement

2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is not superior to contrast-enhanced CT in determining disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer; contrast-enhanced CT should be suffice for surgical planning before interval debulking surgery.

Key Points

• Additional value of 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT over contrast-enhanced CT is undefined in detecting disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

• 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT has comparable diagnostic accuracy compared to contrast-enhanced CT.

• Contrast-enhanced CT will be suffice for surgical planning after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.