错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Is the patient-perceived impact of psoriatic arthritis a global concept? An international study in 13 Arab countries (TACTIC study)

  • Nelly Ziadé,
  • Noura Abbas,
  • Ihsane Hmamouchi,
  • Lina El Kibbi,
  • Avin Maroof,
  • Bassel Elzorkany,
  • Nizar Abdulateef,
  • Asal Adnan,
  • Nabaa Ihsan Awadh,
  • Faiq Isho Gorial,
  • Nada Alchama,
  • Chafika Haouichat,
  • Fatima Alnaimat,
  • Suad Hannawi,
  • Saed Atawnah,
  • Hussein Halabi,
  • Manal Al Mashaleh,
  • Laila Aljazwi,
  • Ahmed Abogamal,
  • Laila Ayoub,
  • Elyes Bouajina,
  • Rachid Bahiri,
  • Sahar Saad,
  • Maha Sabkar,
  • Krystel Aouad,
  • Laure Gossec

摘要

The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) questionnaire, a recommended measure of patient-reported impact for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), was initially developed in Europe and may lack universal validity. Recognizing the need for a culturally appropriate tool for Arab patients, this study aimed to TranslAte, CulTurally adapt, and validate the PsAID in ArabIC (TACTIC). The PsAID-12 was translated into Arabic using a rigorous process of double translation, back-translation, and cognitive debriefing. The Arabic version was then validated through a study conducted in 13 Arab countries in 2022. Participants were consecutive literate adult patients diagnosed with PsA and fulfilling the CASPAR criteria. Collected data included PsAID-12, disease activity, and legacy patient-reported outcomes. Psychometric properties, such as internal consistency, construct validity, and test–retest reliability, were examined. Factors associated with high PsAID-12 total scores (> 4) were explored using multivariable binary logistic regression. A culturally adapted Arabic PsAID-12 questionnaire was achieved with minor rephrasing. The validation study included 554 patients from 13 countries (mean age 45 years, 59% females), with a mean PsAID score of 3.86 (SD 2.33). The Arabic PsAID-12 demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.95), and correlations with other measures ranged from 0.63 to 0.78. Test–retest reliability (N = 138 patients) was substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC 0.90 [0.86–0.93]; Cohen’s kappa 0.80). Factors associated with a high PsAID score were disability (odds ratio, OR 3.15 [2.03–4.89]), depression (OR 1.56 [1.35–1.81]), widespread pain (OR 1.31 [1.12–1.53]), and disease activity (OR 1.29 [1.13–1.47]). Pain and fatigue were identified as the most impactful PsAID-12 domains for PsA patients. The Arabic PsAID is a valid and reliable measure that reflects the priorities of patients with PsA. PsAID scores correlated with disease activity and legacy outcome measures, as expected, indicating PsAID is a consistent measure of PsA impact across cultures. These findings highlight the potential of the Arabic PsAID in improving the care provided to Arabic-speaking patients worldwide.