Scholarlink

<p>This meta-analysis, comprising 24 studies, evaluated the efficacy of venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), including azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC), in untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), comparing outcomes from clinical trials and real-world practice. No significant difference in composite complete response (CRc) rates was observed between clinical trials (52%, 95% CI: 39–65%) and real-world studies (67%, 95% CI: 47–87%). However, overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in clinical trials (13.98 months, 95% CI: 11.89–16.07) compared to real-world cohorts (9.35 months, 95% CI: 8.46–10.23; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.005). In real-world studies, the VEN + HMA combination was associated with a significantly higher CRc rate (67%, 95% CI: 48–85%) compared to HMA monotherapy (17%, 95% CI: 13–21%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.005), although no significant difference in OS was observed between these groups (9.35 vs. 9.38 months; <i>p</i> = 0.964). These findings highlight the need to optimize the implementation of VEN + HMA regimens in clinical practice, as real-world outcomes remain inferior to those reported in clinical trials.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparative efficacy of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia treatment: a meta-analysis of clinical trials and Real-World outcomes

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月30日

查看全文
  • Antonio Sanz-Solas,
  • Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez,
  • Sara Calvo Simal,
  • Rebeca Rodríguez-Veiga,
  • Antonio Solana-Altabella,
  • Pau Montesinos,
  • Jorge Labrador

摘要

This meta-analysis, comprising 24 studies, evaluated the efficacy of venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), including azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC), in untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), comparing outcomes from clinical trials and real-world practice. No significant difference in composite complete response (CRc) rates was observed between clinical trials (52%, 95% CI: 39–65%) and real-world studies (67%, 95% CI: 47–87%). However, overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in clinical trials (13.98 months, 95% CI: 11.89–16.07) compared to real-world cohorts (9.35 months, 95% CI: 8.46–10.23; p < 0.005). In real-world studies, the VEN + HMA combination was associated with a significantly higher CRc rate (67%, 95% CI: 48–85%) compared to HMA monotherapy (17%, 95% CI: 13–21%; p < 0.005), although no significant difference in OS was observed between these groups (9.35 vs. 9.38 months; p = 0.964). These findings highlight the need to optimize the implementation of VEN + HMA regimens in clinical practice, as real-world outcomes remain inferior to those reported in clinical trials.