Scholarlink

<p>Patients treated with an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) face a significant mortality risk, which might trigger existential distress. We aimed to investigate how hematology health care professionals (HCPs) address life-threatening conditions with allo-SCT recipients and their relatives, and what are challenging and supportive aspects. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey, assessing: (1) HCPs’ approaches to address life threat, using a self-developed questionnaire with 19 items categorized in four dimensions (proactive, cautious, reactive, avoiding), (2) challenges/support needs, using self-developed multiple-choice questions, and (3) personal attitudes towards death (Death Acceptance subscale of the Life Attitude Profile-Revised; Death Attitude Profile-Revised). Statistics included association, regression and exploratory factor analysis. We included 104 participants (52 physicians, 45 nurses, 7 psycho-oncologists) from the settings of SCT, general hematology and intensive care. Physicians predominantly addressed life threat proactively, while nurses tended to raise the topic when prompted by patients or a clinical worsening. Overall, 10% of HCPs stated to avoid the topic, even in case of a high risk of death. HCPs’ approaches correlated weakly with their attitudes towards death. A main challenge was to talk with patients/relatives repressing the risk of death (72%). More time resources for these conversations (71%), and mentoring by palliative-care specialists (67%) or psycho-oncologists (65%) were the most frequent support needs. This comprehensive survey reveals strong differences between professions in addressing life threat, and possible influence from personal death attitudes. Further confirmatory research in larger samples is needed to tailor communication trainings on life threat in multi-professional teams. Registration:German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00027290, date of registration: 2022-01-10.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A cross-sectional survey on health care professionals’ approaches, challenges, and support needs when addressing life threat with recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and with their relatives

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月1日

查看全文
  • Anne Pralong,
  • Steffen T. Simon,
  • Udo Holtick,
  • Alinda Reimer,
  • Berenike Schoerger,
  • Sukhvir Kaur,
  • Jithmi Weliwitage,
  • Martin Hellmich,
  • Michael Hallek,
  • Christof Scheid,
  • Raymond Voltz,
  • Marco Herling

摘要

Patients treated with an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) face a significant mortality risk, which might trigger existential distress. We aimed to investigate how hematology health care professionals (HCPs) address life-threatening conditions with allo-SCT recipients and their relatives, and what are challenging and supportive aspects. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey, assessing: (1) HCPs’ approaches to address life threat, using a self-developed questionnaire with 19 items categorized in four dimensions (proactive, cautious, reactive, avoiding), (2) challenges/support needs, using self-developed multiple-choice questions, and (3) personal attitudes towards death (Death Acceptance subscale of the Life Attitude Profile-Revised; Death Attitude Profile-Revised). Statistics included association, regression and exploratory factor analysis. We included 104 participants (52 physicians, 45 nurses, 7 psycho-oncologists) from the settings of SCT, general hematology and intensive care. Physicians predominantly addressed life threat proactively, while nurses tended to raise the topic when prompted by patients or a clinical worsening. Overall, 10% of HCPs stated to avoid the topic, even in case of a high risk of death. HCPs’ approaches correlated weakly with their attitudes towards death. A main challenge was to talk with patients/relatives repressing the risk of death (72%). More time resources for these conversations (71%), and mentoring by palliative-care specialists (67%) or psycho-oncologists (65%) were the most frequent support needs. This comprehensive survey reveals strong differences between professions in addressing life threat, and possible influence from personal death attitudes. Further confirmatory research in larger samples is needed to tailor communication trainings on life threat in multi-professional teams. Registration:German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00027290, date of registration: 2022-01-10.