Scholarlink

Purpose <p>This CIRSE Standards of Practice document aims to provide comprehensive standards for the endovascular treatment of acute pulmonary embolism and includes recommendations for the imaging diagnosis, surveillance, intervention indications and endovascular treatments.</p> Methods <p>The CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee established a writing group of six internationally recognised interventional radiologists with expertise in pulmonary embolism interventions and one research assistant (C.I). The group conducted a pragmatic evidence-based PubMed search for relevant English-language reports on human subjects up to early 2025. The final recommendations are consensus-based.</p> Results <p>Endovascular treatment of pulmonary embolism is highly successful with low complication rates. For acute pulmonary thromboembolic disease, catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are options for patients with intermediate–high-risk and high-risk pulmonary embolism, especially when systemic fibrinolysis fails or is contraindicated.</p> Conclusions <p>Endovascular therapy for acute pulmonary embolism is both safe and effective. This best practice document emphasises early diagnosis, appropriate patient selection and timely intervention.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Endovascular Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月5日

查看全文
  • Juan J. Ciampi-Dopazo,
  • José A. Guirola,
  • John Moriarty,
  • Raman Uberoi,
  • Dimitrios Tsetis,
  • Corrado Ini’,
  • Antonio Basile

摘要

Purpose

This CIRSE Standards of Practice document aims to provide comprehensive standards for the endovascular treatment of acute pulmonary embolism and includes recommendations for the imaging diagnosis, surveillance, intervention indications and endovascular treatments.

Methods

The CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee established a writing group of six internationally recognised interventional radiologists with expertise in pulmonary embolism interventions and one research assistant (C.I). The group conducted a pragmatic evidence-based PubMed search for relevant English-language reports on human subjects up to early 2025. The final recommendations are consensus-based.

Results

Endovascular treatment of pulmonary embolism is highly successful with low complication rates. For acute pulmonary thromboembolic disease, catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are options for patients with intermediate–high-risk and high-risk pulmonary embolism, especially when systemic fibrinolysis fails or is contraindicated.

Conclusions

Endovascular therapy for acute pulmonary embolism is both safe and effective. This best practice document emphasises early diagnosis, appropriate patient selection and timely intervention.