Purpose <p>To assess the utility of pre-procedural knee MRI prior to genicular artery embolization (GAE) for the prognostication of early outcomes for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA).</p> Materials and Methods <p>A single-center study including 39 patients received GAE from 9/2021–4/2025 with pre-procedural MRIs. MRIs were evaluated for structural abnormalities including menisci, ligaments, cartilage, marrow signal, and loose bodies. For 24 patients, synovitis was assessed using a semiquantitative method. Clinical outcomes were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scoring system at pre-GAE and three-month postintervention. Categorical response was assessed as a 50% reduction in the WOMAC Pain. Student t-tests were used to evaluate WOMAC pain reduction, and subset analysis was performed between MRI structural abnormalities and categorical response.</p> Results <p>Fifty-two knees received GAE with pre-procedural MRIs (33 with contrast). There was a 34.6% clinical response rate (<i>N</i> = 8/52). Lateral meniscus and cartilage abnormality were predictive of poor categorical response at three months (<i>P</i> = 0.039–0.040). ≥ 4 structural abnormalities were associated with poor treatment response (<i>P</i> = 0.004). Pre-GAE synovitis was not predictive of categorical response at three months (<i>P</i> = 0.809). Kellgren–Lawrence ≥ 3 was predictive of poor response (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Lower adverse event rate was observed with temporary embolic compared to permanent embolic (<i>P</i> = 0.032).</p> Conclusion <p>Pre-GAE knee MRI may offer short-term prognostic utility. Pre-procedural abnormalities in the lateral menisci and cartilage can predict poor response to GAE at three months. A greater degree of structural abnormality (≥ 4 structural abnormalities) was associated with poor response. Temporary embolic agent may be safer than permanent embolic agent.</p> Graphic Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Prognostication of Three-Month Genicular Artery Embolization Outcomes Using Pre-Procedural MRIs

  • Wali Badar,
  • Layth Alkhani,
  • Faisal Al-Qawasmi,
  • Ajay Varadhan,
  • Ali Husnain,
  • Mudassir Khan,
  • Qian Yu,
  • Magdalena Anitescu,
  • Brendon Ross,
  • Sara Wallace,
  • Narayan Sundaram,
  • Mikin Patel,
  • Osman Ahmed

摘要

Purpose

To assess the utility of pre-procedural knee MRI prior to genicular artery embolization (GAE) for the prognostication of early outcomes for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Materials and Methods

A single-center study including 39 patients received GAE from 9/2021–4/2025 with pre-procedural MRIs. MRIs were evaluated for structural abnormalities including menisci, ligaments, cartilage, marrow signal, and loose bodies. For 24 patients, synovitis was assessed using a semiquantitative method. Clinical outcomes were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scoring system at pre-GAE and three-month postintervention. Categorical response was assessed as a 50% reduction in the WOMAC Pain. Student t-tests were used to evaluate WOMAC pain reduction, and subset analysis was performed between MRI structural abnormalities and categorical response.

Results

Fifty-two knees received GAE with pre-procedural MRIs (33 with contrast). There was a 34.6% clinical response rate (N = 8/52). Lateral meniscus and cartilage abnormality were predictive of poor categorical response at three months (P = 0.039–0.040). ≥ 4 structural abnormalities were associated with poor treatment response (P = 0.004). Pre-GAE synovitis was not predictive of categorical response at three months (P = 0.809). Kellgren–Lawrence ≥ 3 was predictive of poor response (P < 0.001). Lower adverse event rate was observed with temporary embolic compared to permanent embolic (P = 0.032).

Conclusion

Pre-GAE knee MRI may offer short-term prognostic utility. Pre-procedural abnormalities in the lateral menisci and cartilage can predict poor response to GAE at three months. A greater degree of structural abnormality (≥ 4 structural abnormalities) was associated with poor response. Temporary embolic agent may be safer than permanent embolic agent.

Graphic Abstract