Background <p>Asian rhinoplasty frequently requires robust structural support to counteract a thick skin envelope. However, relying solely on septal cartilage often leads to graft depletion after preserving a safety L-strut. This study quantifies the volumetric sufficiency of the composite bony-cartilaginous unit to address this limitation while ensuring skull base safety.</p> Methods <p>A retrospective computed tomography analysis was performed on 116 Asian adults (60 men, 56 women). A standardized harvest template was virtually executed, assuming the preservation of a 10-mm L-strut. Total septal area, harvestable cartilage, and the composite bony-cartilaginous unit (cartilage, perpendicular plate of the ethmoid, and vomer) were quantified using defined anatomical landmarks.</p> Results <p>The harvestable septal cartilage averaged 461.5&#xa0;mm<sup>2</sup>, which was significantly smaller in women than in men (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Expanding the harvest to include the bony septum yielded a composite area of 992.0&#xa0;mm<sup>2</sup>, representing a 2.21-fold increase in graft availability. Radiographic analysis established critical safety landmarks: the mean skull base angle was 123.6°, the distance from the anterior nasal spine to the cribriform plate was 48.9&#xa0;mm, and the distance to the anterior sphenoid wall was 54.3&#xa0;mm.</p> Conclusions <p>Septal cartilage is an inherently scarce resource in Asian rhinoplasty, particularly in females. Harvesting the septum as a bony-cartilaginous unit safely and reliably doubles the graft supply. With precise osteotomy trajectories, this composite graft eliminates the need for distant donor site morbidity, serving as an optimal local reserve.</p> Level of Evidence III <p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors <a href="http://www.springer.com/00266">www.springer.com/00266</a>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Optimizing the Septal Donor Site in Asian Rhinoplasty: A Computed Tomography-Based Simulation of the Bony-Cartilaginous Unit and Skull Base Safety

  • Chuong Dinh Nguyen,
  • Dan Nhat-Linh Chau,
  • Huy Quang Nguyen,
  • Tho Thi-Kieu Nguyen

摘要

Background

Asian rhinoplasty frequently requires robust structural support to counteract a thick skin envelope. However, relying solely on septal cartilage often leads to graft depletion after preserving a safety L-strut. This study quantifies the volumetric sufficiency of the composite bony-cartilaginous unit to address this limitation while ensuring skull base safety.

Methods

A retrospective computed tomography analysis was performed on 116 Asian adults (60 men, 56 women). A standardized harvest template was virtually executed, assuming the preservation of a 10-mm L-strut. Total septal area, harvestable cartilage, and the composite bony-cartilaginous unit (cartilage, perpendicular plate of the ethmoid, and vomer) were quantified using defined anatomical landmarks.

Results

The harvestable septal cartilage averaged 461.5 mm2, which was significantly smaller in women than in men (p < 0.001). Expanding the harvest to include the bony septum yielded a composite area of 992.0 mm2, representing a 2.21-fold increase in graft availability. Radiographic analysis established critical safety landmarks: the mean skull base angle was 123.6°, the distance from the anterior nasal spine to the cribriform plate was 48.9 mm, and the distance to the anterior sphenoid wall was 54.3 mm.

Conclusions

Septal cartilage is an inherently scarce resource in Asian rhinoplasty, particularly in females. Harvesting the septum as a bony-cartilaginous unit safely and reliably doubles the graft supply. With precise osteotomy trajectories, this composite graft eliminates the need for distant donor site morbidity, serving as an optimal local reserve.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.