Scholarlink

Background <p>Before primary rhinoplasty, it is crucial to identify patients whose concerns may not be adequately addressed by surgery. In 1999, Gorney and Martello introduced SIMON to describe patients who may be unsatisfied: single, immature, male, overly expectant, and narcissistic. This paper advocates for an evidence-based mnemonic to enhance patient selection.</p> Methods <p>TriNetX database medical records were queried for patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty at least three years ago at ≥ 15 years old. A Cox proportional hazards model quantified relationships between 115 patient variables, including SIMON-like characteristics, and risk of revision rhinoplasty.</p> Results <p>Of 101,562 patients, more female patients underwent revision rhinoplasty than male patients (<i>p </i>= 0.062). Revision risk was 16.8× higher with social exclusion/rejection; 5.36× higher with personality disorders; 3.45× higher with history of subcutaneous filler injections; 2.64× higher with anxiolytic or sedative dependence; 1.38× higher with male sex; and 1.16× higher with anxiolytic use. “Married” relationship status, BMI &gt; 30, older age at surgery, and diagnosed deviated septum were negative associations with revision rhinoplasty.</p> Conclusion <p>In the current day, additional nuance in social relationships, surgical history, psychiatric diagnosis, and surgical indication may be required to predict revision rhinoplasty. We propose an acronym, BLAKE: Borderline/personality disorders, Lonely/social exclusion, Anxiolytics/sedatives, Kosmetik focus, and previous Enhancement with fillers. BLAKE captures the most salient predictors of revision at the time of primary rhinoplasty, updating the SIMON acronym to be non-gendered and nonreligious.</p> Level of Evidence III <p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors &#xa0;<a href="http://www.springer.com/00266">www.springer.com/00266</a>.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Current Predictors of Revision at Time of Primary Rhinoplasty

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月24日

查看全文
  • Noelle C. Garbaccio,
  • Jade E. Smith,
  • Dorien I. Schonebaum,
  • Lacey Foster,
  • Morvarid Mehdizadeh,
  • Justin J. Cordero,
  • Samuel J. Lin

摘要

Background

Before primary rhinoplasty, it is crucial to identify patients whose concerns may not be adequately addressed by surgery. In 1999, Gorney and Martello introduced SIMON to describe patients who may be unsatisfied: single, immature, male, overly expectant, and narcissistic. This paper advocates for an evidence-based mnemonic to enhance patient selection.

Methods

TriNetX database medical records were queried for patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty at least three years ago at ≥ 15 years old. A Cox proportional hazards model quantified relationships between 115 patient variables, including SIMON-like characteristics, and risk of revision rhinoplasty.

Results

Of 101,562 patients, more female patients underwent revision rhinoplasty than male patients (p = 0.062). Revision risk was 16.8× higher with social exclusion/rejection; 5.36× higher with personality disorders; 3.45× higher with history of subcutaneous filler injections; 2.64× higher with anxiolytic or sedative dependence; 1.38× higher with male sex; and 1.16× higher with anxiolytic use. “Married” relationship status, BMI > 30, older age at surgery, and diagnosed deviated septum were negative associations with revision rhinoplasty.

Conclusion

In the current day, additional nuance in social relationships, surgical history, psychiatric diagnosis, and surgical indication may be required to predict revision rhinoplasty. We propose an acronym, BLAKE: Borderline/personality disorders, Lonely/social exclusion, Anxiolytics/sedatives, Kosmetik focus, and previous Enhancement with fillers. BLAKE captures the most salient predictors of revision at the time of primary rhinoplasty, updating the SIMON acronym to be non-gendered and nonreligious.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266.