Background <p>Gynecomastia, a non-cancerous enlargement of breast tissue in males, can significantly impact self-esteem and social interactions. While many cases resolve without intervention, some require surgical treatment due to cosmetic concerns or persistent discomfort. This study presents a novel surgical modification for managing gynecomastia grade IIb.</p> Methods <p>This prospective case series, conducted from July 2020 to July 2024 at two tertiary hospitals, included participants aged 18–70 years with grade IIb gynecomastia. Excluding smokers and those lost to follow-up, the study assessed physical appearance, mental satisfaction, and complications up to 6 months post-surgery. The innovative technique involved an oval eccentric excision with an inferior pedicle to facilitate the upward and medial repositioning of the nipple-areola complex (NAC).</p> Results <p>Twenty-three participants (mean age 26.6 years, SD = 7.6) underwent the modified surgical technique. All changes in measurements were statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the degree of correction, surgical scars, and nipple-areola distance and shape, with no dissatisfied or very dissatisfied opinions recorded. No complications were noted, including infection, nipple necrosis, hypertrophic scars, and hematoma.</p> Conclusion <p>The novel surgical modification for grade IIb gynecomastia offers a promising approach to achieving superior aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. The technique effectively corrects asymmetry and enhances the overall aesthetic outcome. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine the technique.</p> Level of Evidence III <p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors <a href="http://www.springer.com/00266">www.springer.com/00266.</a></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Innovative Surgical Techniques for Gynecomastia: Enhancing Patient Aesthetic Satisfaction

  • Mohammadhossein Hesamirostami,
  • Seyed Mohammad Hadi Bagheri Rostami,
  • Parna Hosseini,
  • Golvash Tavakolian,
  • Mahmood Moosazadeh,
  • Mohammad Javad Najafi

摘要

Background

Gynecomastia, a non-cancerous enlargement of breast tissue in males, can significantly impact self-esteem and social interactions. While many cases resolve without intervention, some require surgical treatment due to cosmetic concerns or persistent discomfort. This study presents a novel surgical modification for managing gynecomastia grade IIb.

Methods

This prospective case series, conducted from July 2020 to July 2024 at two tertiary hospitals, included participants aged 18–70 years with grade IIb gynecomastia. Excluding smokers and those lost to follow-up, the study assessed physical appearance, mental satisfaction, and complications up to 6 months post-surgery. The innovative technique involved an oval eccentric excision with an inferior pedicle to facilitate the upward and medial repositioning of the nipple-areola complex (NAC).

Results

Twenty-three participants (mean age 26.6 years, SD = 7.6) underwent the modified surgical technique. All changes in measurements were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the degree of correction, surgical scars, and nipple-areola distance and shape, with no dissatisfied or very dissatisfied opinions recorded. No complications were noted, including infection, nipple necrosis, hypertrophic scars, and hematoma.

Conclusion

The novel surgical modification for grade IIb gynecomastia offers a promising approach to achieving superior aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. The technique effectively corrects asymmetry and enhances the overall aesthetic outcome. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine the technique.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.