Scholarlink

<p>This manuscript, a Letter to the Editor, is in response to the recently published research article that compared the effectiveness of pectoral nerve (PECS) block I versus PECS block II in gynecomastia surgeries. A few important concepts that were misconceived by the authors of the original article are discussed here.</p><p><i>Level of Evidence V</i> This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors <a href="http://www.springer.com/00266">www.springer.com/00266</a>.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Pectoral Nerve (PECS) Blocks in Gynecomastia Surgeries

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月23日

查看全文
  • Raghuraman M. Sethuraman,
  • Sudhakaran Rajendran

摘要

This manuscript, a Letter to the Editor, is in response to the recently published research article that compared the effectiveness of pectoral nerve (PECS) block I versus PECS block II in gynecomastia surgeries. A few important concepts that were misconceived by the authors of the original article are discussed here.

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.