Background <p>Keloid management has been debated for decades due to unsatisfactory outcomes and high recurrence rates. Intralesional injection and radiotherapy are prominent nonsurgical interventions for keloids. However, monotherapies for keloids usually yield poor efficacy and cause&#xa0;patient burden due to additional treatment sessions and side effects, affecting adherence. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injection with electron beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy compared to intralesional TAC+5-FU injection alone.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively reviewed patients who were initially treated between 2019 and 2022 and followed for more than 12 months. The baseline condition, the Vancouver Scar Scale&#xa0;(VSS), recurrence, symptoms, follow-up period, and patient self-assessment were recorded.</p> Results <p>The study included a cohort of 100 eligible patients with a total of 111 keloids. Seventy-one of patients received the combined therapy and 29 received TAC+5-FU injection only. The results revealed that combining injection with radiotherapy reduced the recurrence rate and improved symptoms such as pruritus and pain while posing minimal extra risk of side effects. Moreover, patients receiving combined therapy assessed treatment outcomes more positively than those solely receiving injection therapy. Other factors that related to increased risk of recurrence included a higher VSS score at the end of treatment and the presence of keloid family history.</p> Conclusions <p>The combined schedule of intralesional TAC+5-FU injection with radiotherapy could effectively reduce&#xa0;the recurrence&#xa0;rate and alleviate&#xa0;symptoms of keloids.</p> Level of Evidence IV <p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors <a href="http://www.springer.com/00266">www.springer.com/00266</a>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Combining Steroid Plus 5-Fluorouracil Injection with Radiotherapy Versus Injection Alone for Keloids: A 4-Year Retrospective Study

  • Beiyi Wu,
  • Bohan Zhang,
  • Haitao Xiao,
  • Xuewen Xu

摘要

Background

Keloid management has been debated for decades due to unsatisfactory outcomes and high recurrence rates. Intralesional injection and radiotherapy are prominent nonsurgical interventions for keloids. However, monotherapies for keloids usually yield poor efficacy and cause patient burden due to additional treatment sessions and side effects, affecting adherence. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injection with electron beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy compared to intralesional TAC+5-FU injection alone.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who were initially treated between 2019 and 2022 and followed for more than 12 months. The baseline condition, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), recurrence, symptoms, follow-up period, and patient self-assessment were recorded.

Results

The study included a cohort of 100 eligible patients with a total of 111 keloids. Seventy-one of patients received the combined therapy and 29 received TAC+5-FU injection only. The results revealed that combining injection with radiotherapy reduced the recurrence rate and improved symptoms such as pruritus and pain while posing minimal extra risk of side effects. Moreover, patients receiving combined therapy assessed treatment outcomes more positively than those solely receiving injection therapy. Other factors that related to increased risk of recurrence included a higher VSS score at the end of treatment and the presence of keloid family history.

Conclusions

The combined schedule of intralesional TAC+5-FU injection with radiotherapy could effectively reduce the recurrence rate and alleviate symptoms of keloids.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.