错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Novel Conchal Cartilage Harvesting Technique

  • Qingqing Li,
  • Zaihong Chen,
  • Zhiyuan Jiang,
  • Junnan Deng,
  • Wei Cui,
  • Zhen Cai,
  • Yang Sheng

摘要

Background

Conchal cartilage is generally favored in rhinoplasty with a satisfied aesthetic outcome. However, patients may suffer from postoperative donor auricle deformities.

Objectives

This study introduced a novel conchal cartilage harvesting technique which can minimize the deformity of auricle and harvest the sufficient amounts of grafts.

Methods

This study proposed preservation of the concha cymba and cavum support structures to minimize the deformity of auricle and harvest of cartilage hidden in the craniofacial region to obtain the sufficient amounts. The medical records of 60 patients who underwent the novel conchal cartilage harvesting were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperative aesthetic outcomes were assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative photographs according to the deformation extent of auricular subunits (cymba concha, cavum concha, antihelix, helix crus and intertragal notch) on a four-point Likert scale. Additionally, function and complications were analyzed.

Results

56 patients performed unilateral conchal cartilage harvesting (8 with right-side and 48 with left-side) and 4 performed bilateral harvesting. The average aesthetic score, rated on a four-point Likert scale (1 = significant deformation, 2 = moderated deformation, 3 = slight deformation, 4 = complete no deformation), were 3.83 ± 0.03 points, respectively. The functional scores, rated on a four-point Likert scale (1 = significant damage, 2 = moderated damage, 3 = slight damage, 4 = complete no damage), was 3.94±0.03. Complications included hematoma, delayed wound healing and hypopigmentated scar in six ears (9.4%).

Conclusions

This novel technique can minimize the deformity of auricle, as shown by the outcome scores, and allows for sufficient amount of grafting material acquired.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.