Examining the Morphology of External Genitalia in Iranian Women: A Labiagram-based Study in Iran and its Influence on Patients' Self-Satisfaction

This study aims to document a woman's external genitalia data in the form of a labiogram and investigate whether variations in the size of specific components of a woman's external genitalia can influence her overall satisfaction with the esthetic appearance of her genitalia.

A cross-sectional observational study was carried out on a sample of 500 Iranian women. Socio-demographic information was collected for all participants, and they completed the Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS) questionnaire. Measurements of different external genitalia components were obtained for all participants.

The findings revealed that there was no significant association between the measurements of the external genitalia and age or BMI. However, a significant negative correlation was observed between the total score on the FGSIS and specific parameters related to the width of different sections of the labia minora. The correlations were as follows: left lower third (r = − 0.305), lower right third (r = − 0.302), left middle third (r = − 0.365), right middle third (r = − 0.435), left upper third (r = − 0.397), and right upper third (r = − 0.407) (P value< 0.001). Moreover, cutoff points of 1.95 cm on the left side and 1.90 cm on the right side were identified through analysis as thresholds for predicting dissatisfaction among women.

This study suggests that the width of the labia minora might influence certain women's motivation to undergo labiaplasty, a surgical procedure designed to modify the labia minora. To help women make informed decisions, it is crucial for those considering the procedure to have a comprehensive understanding of different labia minora types, potential benefits, and associated risks. By being well-informed, individuals can make choices that align with their personal preferences and priorities.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.