Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Preoperative anxiety (Pop-Anx) is highly prevalent among patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Pop-Anx can stem from fears related to the procedure, anaesthesia, or the recovery process. It has been linked to poorer postoperative outcomes, including greater pain, reduced function, and a lower quality of life. Despite its clinical significance, Pop-Anx is inconsistently assessed due to a lack of standardized tools and clear guidelines. The objective was to identify instruments used for measuring Pop-Anx in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgeries.</p> Methods <p>A systematic search was conducted across five databases up to September 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Data on anxiety assessment tools, timing, administration, and related outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies with a low risk of bias using random-effects models.</p> Results <p>Screening of the literature revealed that 42 studies assessed Pop-Anx, involving a total of 115,380 patients. Ten different tools were used to measure Pop-Anx, with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) being the most frequent. Significant variability was observed in assessment timing and methodology. A meta-analysis showed that Pop-Anx was positively correlated with postoperative anxiety (z = 0.60) and pain (z = 0.22) and negatively correlated with joint function (z = -0.25). Females reported higher Pop-Anx (g = 0.38). The timing of outcome assessment did not significantly moderate these relationships.</p> Conclusion <p>Although Pop-Anx is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, it is assessed using heterogeneous and sometimes inadequate tools. Standardized, context-specific assessment methods are needed. Despite its clinical relevance, Pop-Anx remains underassessed in some common orthopaedic procedures.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Preoperative anxiety assessment in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月1日

查看全文
  • Jules Opplert,
  • Pauline Eon,
  • Etienne Delforge,
  • Thibaut Noailles,
  • Alexandre Hardy,
  • Vincent Morin,
  • Arnaud Bruchard,
  • Vincent Fontanier,
  • David Laplaud

摘要

Purpose

Preoperative anxiety (Pop-Anx) is highly prevalent among patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Pop-Anx can stem from fears related to the procedure, anaesthesia, or the recovery process. It has been linked to poorer postoperative outcomes, including greater pain, reduced function, and a lower quality of life. Despite its clinical significance, Pop-Anx is inconsistently assessed due to a lack of standardized tools and clear guidelines. The objective was to identify instruments used for measuring Pop-Anx in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgeries.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across five databases up to September 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Data on anxiety assessment tools, timing, administration, and related outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies with a low risk of bias using random-effects models.

Results

Screening of the literature revealed that 42 studies assessed Pop-Anx, involving a total of 115,380 patients. Ten different tools were used to measure Pop-Anx, with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) being the most frequent. Significant variability was observed in assessment timing and methodology. A meta-analysis showed that Pop-Anx was positively correlated with postoperative anxiety (z = 0.60) and pain (z = 0.22) and negatively correlated with joint function (z = -0.25). Females reported higher Pop-Anx (g = 0.38). The timing of outcome assessment did not significantly moderate these relationships.

Conclusion

Although Pop-Anx is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, it is assessed using heterogeneous and sometimes inadequate tools. Standardized, context-specific assessment methods are needed. Despite its clinical relevance, Pop-Anx remains underassessed in some common orthopaedic procedures.