Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Implant removal in orthopedics and traumatology is still a controversial topic. Benefits and drawbacks lead to relative indications, mainly depending on patients’ demands and surgeons’ perspectives. This study aims to report the current attitudes and practices of Italian surgeons who participated in a survey.</p> Materials and Methods <p>An online-based questionnaire of 25 items was distributed to all the members of the Italian Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SIOT) regarding their indications, usual practices, and complications encountered with hardware removal in upper and lower limbs. The survey was open from July 2024 to October 2024. Exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied.</p> Results <p>Five hundred answers were received. While implant removal is primarily achieved in symptomatic patients, in the case of asymptomatic patients, it is not routinely performed, with a slightly higher tendency of removal in those aged 16–40 years old. These tendencies were registered both for the upper and lower limbs, with more reticence in hardware removal in the upper limbs. 96% of respondents declared the lack of hospital guidelines regarding this kind of surgery. The most feared intraoperative complications during the removal concerned screw stripping and implant breakage, with only 0.6% of respondents reporting no intraoperative difficulties. While patient discomfort and avoidance of future complications were the main indications for removal, postoperative complications occurred as wound scarring concerns, persistence of symptoms and bleeding. Despite not being considered a “procedure for the resident”, when residents were specifically questioned, in 76% of cases they felt self-confident ≥ 7 on a scale from 1 to 10. Lastly, according to 62% of the respondents, titanium implants are more difficult to remove than stainless steel ones.</p> Conclusion <p>This survey describes a general tendency to not routinely remove implants, even in younger patients in the lower and especially upper limbs, unless in case of symptoms. Hardware removal could evolve from a simple procedure into a more complex surgery due to intraoperative technical difficulties. A lack of universal policy and guidelines exists throughout the Italian territory.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Implant removal: benefits and drawbacks - Results of a survey with five hundred participants from the Italian Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SIOT) and comparison with other international trends

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月26日

查看全文
  • Virginia Masoni,
  • Corrado Ciatti,
  • Luca Andriollo,
  • Giovanni Vicenti,
  • Fabrizio Rivera

摘要

Introduction

Implant removal in orthopedics and traumatology is still a controversial topic. Benefits and drawbacks lead to relative indications, mainly depending on patients’ demands and surgeons’ perspectives. This study aims to report the current attitudes and practices of Italian surgeons who participated in a survey.

Materials and Methods

An online-based questionnaire of 25 items was distributed to all the members of the Italian Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SIOT) regarding their indications, usual practices, and complications encountered with hardware removal in upper and lower limbs. The survey was open from July 2024 to October 2024. Exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied.

Results

Five hundred answers were received. While implant removal is primarily achieved in symptomatic patients, in the case of asymptomatic patients, it is not routinely performed, with a slightly higher tendency of removal in those aged 16–40 years old. These tendencies were registered both for the upper and lower limbs, with more reticence in hardware removal in the upper limbs. 96% of respondents declared the lack of hospital guidelines regarding this kind of surgery. The most feared intraoperative complications during the removal concerned screw stripping and implant breakage, with only 0.6% of respondents reporting no intraoperative difficulties. While patient discomfort and avoidance of future complications were the main indications for removal, postoperative complications occurred as wound scarring concerns, persistence of symptoms and bleeding. Despite not being considered a “procedure for the resident”, when residents were specifically questioned, in 76% of cases they felt self-confident ≥ 7 on a scale from 1 to 10. Lastly, according to 62% of the respondents, titanium implants are more difficult to remove than stainless steel ones.

Conclusion

This survey describes a general tendency to not routinely remove implants, even in younger patients in the lower and especially upper limbs, unless in case of symptoms. Hardware removal could evolve from a simple procedure into a more complex surgery due to intraoperative technical difficulties. A lack of universal policy and guidelines exists throughout the Italian territory.