Comparison of the medial midline and the anterolateral portal in ankle arthroscopy for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the medial talus

期刊论文
发表日期：

2024年3月25日

查看全文

Piqian Zhao,
Zijie Pei,
Junhui Xing,
Mingyang Gao,
Changbao Wang,
Yingjie Xu,
Hongtao Zhang,
Yu Cheng

摘要

Purpose

To compare the clinical efficacy and complication rates between the medial midline and anterolateral portals in ankle arthroscopy for treating medial osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with medial OLTs who underwent either a dual medial approach (via the medial midline and anteromedial portal) or a traditional approach (via the anterolateral and anteromedial portal) between June 2017 and January 2023. The degree of injury was evaluated by radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scoring system. The incidence of postoperative complications, including superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) injury, was evaluated in all patients.

Results

There were 39 patients in total; 16 patients underwent the dual medial approach, and 23 patients underwent the traditional approach. The mean age was 39.4 ± 9.0 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 18.7 ± 6.4 months. The clinical outcomes improved significantly in both groups (*P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative complications were mainly SPN injury. The incidence of SPN injury was 13.0% in the traditional approach group and 0% in the dual medial approach group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05), but a trend of reduction in SPN injury was observed in the dual medial approach group.

Conclusion

The dual medial approach can also treat medial OLTs well, providing clear visualization and more convenient operation and reducing the possibility of injury to the SPN compared with the traditional approach. Therefore, we consider that the MM portal would be a good alternative to the anterolateral portal in treating medial OLTs.