Background <p>The therapeutic efficacy of oncolytic vaccinia virus (JX-594) has been demonstrated in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); however, only selected patients respond, and there are no predictive biomarkers for therapeutic response. We aimed to identify predictive biomarkers for JX-594 treatment and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.</p> Methods <p>Four cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) models were developed using representative ccRCC cell lines harboring common mutations. Tumors were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of BALB/c nude mice. Mice were treated with vehicle or JX-594 via intratumoral injection on days 0, 3, and 6, and tumor growth was evaluated. Therapeutic efficacies of JX-594 and a STING agonist were compared in the BAP1-mutant (769-P) CDX model.</p> Results <p>All four CDX models showed significant tumor shrinkage following JX-594 treatment versus control. JX-594 exhibited greater efficacy than the STING agonist in BAP1-deficient xenografts. The BAP1 mutation was associated with rapid tumor progression and a stronger response to JX-594. JX-594 induced IFN-β expression through IRF7-dependent signaling in BAP1-deficient cells, bypassing impaired STING–IRF3 signaling.</p> Conclusions <p>We identified BAP1 as a potential predictive biomarker for JX-594 treatment and explored its underlying mechanisms. However, given that the study used immunodeficient models, the findings reflect tumor-intrinsic interferon responses and require further validation in immunocompetent models to assess immune microenvironment modulation and clinical relevance.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

BAP1 as a predictive biomarker of therapeutic response to oncolytic vaccinia virus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma therapy

  • Jee Soo Park,
  • Won Sik Jang,
  • Myung Eun Lee,
  • Jongchan Kim,
  • Keunhee Oh,
  • Namhee Lee,
  • Won Sik Ham

摘要

Background

The therapeutic efficacy of oncolytic vaccinia virus (JX-594) has been demonstrated in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); however, only selected patients respond, and there are no predictive biomarkers for therapeutic response. We aimed to identify predictive biomarkers for JX-594 treatment and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Methods

Four cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) models were developed using representative ccRCC cell lines harboring common mutations. Tumors were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of BALB/c nude mice. Mice were treated with vehicle or JX-594 via intratumoral injection on days 0, 3, and 6, and tumor growth was evaluated. Therapeutic efficacies of JX-594 and a STING agonist were compared in the BAP1-mutant (769-P) CDX model.

Results

All four CDX models showed significant tumor shrinkage following JX-594 treatment versus control. JX-594 exhibited greater efficacy than the STING agonist in BAP1-deficient xenografts. The BAP1 mutation was associated with rapid tumor progression and a stronger response to JX-594. JX-594 induced IFN-β expression through IRF7-dependent signaling in BAP1-deficient cells, bypassing impaired STING–IRF3 signaling.

Conclusions

We identified BAP1 as a potential predictive biomarker for JX-594 treatment and explored its underlying mechanisms. However, given that the study used immunodeficient models, the findings reflect tumor-intrinsic interferon responses and require further validation in immunocompetent models to assess immune microenvironment modulation and clinical relevance.