Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To determine the accuracy of CEUS in identifying residual or recurrent tumor post nephron-sparing procedures.</p> Materials and methods <p>CEUS studies performed post nephron sparing procedure (RFA, cryoablation, MWA, partial nephrectomy) from January 2018 to May 2025 were retrospectively reviewed at 2 centers. Informed consent was waived. Patient charts were reviewed for follow-up procedures and patient status. CEUS studies were performed on a Philips Epic ultrasound with a C5-1 transducer using Lumason with a dose of 1.0 to 2.0&#xa0;cc. A 3-minute cine clip was saved. An examination was considered a true positive if there was contrast in the procedure site and either biopsy proven tumor or persistent enhancement for over 1 year. An examination was considered a true negative if there was no contrast enhancement in the procedure site.</p> Results <p>There were 193 lesions in 188 patients. (mean age 68.0 years +/−&#xa0;1.4 {SD} (range 33–90) ; 115 men). There were 16 radiofrequency ablation, 38 cryoablations, 4 microwave ablations, and 135 partial nephrectomies. The average lesion size was 2.9&#xa0;cm (IQR 2.2,3.7; range 1.4–7.1&#xa0;cm). There were 17 (8.8%) true positive cases and 176 (91.2%) true negative cases. Time of follow-up ranged from 1 to 336 months (mean 35.1, IQR 12, 70). There were no false positive or false negative cases based on biopsy and long-term follow-up. There were 92 (47.7%) that also had CECT. There was 96.7% concordance of CEUS with CT. There were 3 CEUS cases positive with a negative CECT.</p> Conclusions <p>CEUS is an accurate method in determining residual or recurrent tumor in patients having nephron sparing procedures.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Contrast enhanced ultrasound evaluation of nephron sparing treatment for renal cell carcinoma

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月9日

查看全文
  • Richard G. Barr,
  • Davide Roccarina,
  • Louis Mazzareilli,
  • Parker Bauman,
  • Kevin Cheng

摘要

Purpose

To determine the accuracy of CEUS in identifying residual or recurrent tumor post nephron-sparing procedures.

Materials and methods

CEUS studies performed post nephron sparing procedure (RFA, cryoablation, MWA, partial nephrectomy) from January 2018 to May 2025 were retrospectively reviewed at 2 centers. Informed consent was waived. Patient charts were reviewed for follow-up procedures and patient status. CEUS studies were performed on a Philips Epic ultrasound with a C5-1 transducer using Lumason with a dose of 1.0 to 2.0 cc. A 3-minute cine clip was saved. An examination was considered a true positive if there was contrast in the procedure site and either biopsy proven tumor or persistent enhancement for over 1 year. An examination was considered a true negative if there was no contrast enhancement in the procedure site.

Results

There were 193 lesions in 188 patients. (mean age 68.0 years +/− 1.4 {SD} (range 33–90) ; 115 men). There were 16 radiofrequency ablation, 38 cryoablations, 4 microwave ablations, and 135 partial nephrectomies. The average lesion size was 2.9 cm (IQR 2.2,3.7; range 1.4–7.1 cm). There were 17 (8.8%) true positive cases and 176 (91.2%) true negative cases. Time of follow-up ranged from 1 to 336 months (mean 35.1, IQR 12, 70). There were no false positive or false negative cases based on biopsy and long-term follow-up. There were 92 (47.7%) that also had CECT. There was 96.7% concordance of CEUS with CT. There were 3 CEUS cases positive with a negative CECT.

Conclusions

CEUS is an accurate method in determining residual or recurrent tumor in patients having nephron sparing procedures.