Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Visceral obesity is a significant health risk, and the visceral fat area (VFA) measured on CT is a reliable indicator. The current study investigated whether the CT colonography (CTC)-derived VFA can identify visceral obesity, accounting for imaging variations due to colonic insufflation.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively included patients who underwent both abdominal CT and CTC within 30 days. The waist circumference, VFA, and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were measured at the umbilical and L1–L5 vertebral levels. Visceral obesity was defined as a VFA ≥ 100&#xa0;cm² at the umbilical level on CT. The diagnostic performances of the CTC-derived VFA, BMI, and waist circumference were compared. In a secondary analysis, regression models were constructed to estimate the CT-derived VFA from the CTC measurements. Model performance was evaluated via 5-fold cross-validation and quantified with the mean absolute error (MAE).</p> Results <p>Fifty-eight patients were included (median age 51.0 years, IQR 43.0–58.8; 42 males, 16 females). Compared with CT, CTC revealed a significantly greater waist circumference (89.9 vs. 87.5&#xa0;cm, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and a lower VFA (96.0 vs. 110.3&#xa0;cm², <i>P</i> = 0.005), whereas there was no significant difference in the SFA. The umbilical slice position remained unchanged in 49 patients (84.5%), and no patient’s position shifted by two or more levels. The CTC-derived VFA demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for visceral obesity, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.90 and 0.93. BMI yielded 0.73 and 0.75, and waist circumference 0.90 and 0.79, respectively. Incorporating additional slices (e.g., L2) further reduced the MAE from 19.76 to 16.54&#xa0;cm² (<i>P</i> = 0.013).</p> Conclusion <p>The CTC-derived VFA was shown to be a viable marker for identifying visceral obesity, thus potentially offering a secondary diagnostic resource without additional radiation exposure or costs. While single-slice models showed reasonable performance, multi-slice models demonstrated greater predictive accuracy.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

CT colonography for assessing visceral obesity: clinical utility beyond colorectal screening

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月22日

查看全文
  • Hidekazu Takahashi,
  • Takahiro Mihara,
  • Aiko Uchida,
  • Yuto Okawa,
  • Koichi Nagura,
  • Jun Hinosawa,
  • Masaki Okamoto

摘要

Purpose

Visceral obesity is a significant health risk, and the visceral fat area (VFA) measured on CT is a reliable indicator. The current study investigated whether the CT colonography (CTC)-derived VFA can identify visceral obesity, accounting for imaging variations due to colonic insufflation.

Methods

We retrospectively included patients who underwent both abdominal CT and CTC within 30 days. The waist circumference, VFA, and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were measured at the umbilical and L1–L5 vertebral levels. Visceral obesity was defined as a VFA ≥ 100 cm² at the umbilical level on CT. The diagnostic performances of the CTC-derived VFA, BMI, and waist circumference were compared. In a secondary analysis, regression models were constructed to estimate the CT-derived VFA from the CTC measurements. Model performance was evaluated via 5-fold cross-validation and quantified with the mean absolute error (MAE).

Results

Fifty-eight patients were included (median age 51.0 years, IQR 43.0–58.8; 42 males, 16 females). Compared with CT, CTC revealed a significantly greater waist circumference (89.9 vs. 87.5 cm, P < 0.001) and a lower VFA (96.0 vs. 110.3 cm², P = 0.005), whereas there was no significant difference in the SFA. The umbilical slice position remained unchanged in 49 patients (84.5%), and no patient’s position shifted by two or more levels. The CTC-derived VFA demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for visceral obesity, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.90 and 0.93. BMI yielded 0.73 and 0.75, and waist circumference 0.90 and 0.79, respectively. Incorporating additional slices (e.g., L2) further reduced the MAE from 19.76 to 16.54 cm² (P = 0.013).

Conclusion

The CTC-derived VFA was shown to be a viable marker for identifying visceral obesity, thus potentially offering a secondary diagnostic resource without additional radiation exposure or costs. While single-slice models showed reasonable performance, multi-slice models demonstrated greater predictive accuracy.

Graphical abstract