Scholarlink

Objectives <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) in men and to compare with those in women.</p> Methods <p>One hundred twenty-two patients (38 men and 84 women) with histologically confirmed SPNs from seven institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data, including demographics and preoperative diagnoses, were reviewed, and imaging characteristics on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were assessed. Clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between men and women.</p> Results <p>Men were significantly older than women (mean age: 43.7 years vs. 31.1 years, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and had smaller tumors (mean size: 28.5&#xa0;mm vs. 38.5&#xa0;mm, <i>p</i> = 0.014). Regarding preoperative diagnosis, SPN was suspected less frequently in men (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with a higher rate of biopsy (<i>p</i> = 0.006). Imaging characteristics revealed that SPNs in men had fewer hemorrhagic changes (<i>p</i> = 0.035), more frequent internal calcifications (<i>p</i> = 0.003), and a higher proportion of solid components (<i>p</i> = 0.009). In women, tumor size (<i>ρ</i> = − 0.292, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and the proportion of solid components (<i>ρ</i> = − 0.276, <i>p</i> = 0.011) negatively correlated with age, whereas no correlations were observed in men.</p> Conclusion <p>SPNs in men exhibit distinct clinical and imaging characteristics, including older age, smaller size, a greater proportion of solid components, and fewer degenerative features compared with those in women. Recognizing these sex-specific differences is important for improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding the optimal management of patients with SPNs.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms in male patients exhibit different clinical and imaging features compared with those in female patients

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月9日

查看全文
  • Ryohei Kozuki,
  • Keitaro Sofue,
  • Takamichi Murakami,
  • Akiyoshi Suzuki,
  • Akira Katayama,
  • Hisataka Ito,
  • Eriko Yoshizawa,
  • Kenichi Tanaka,
  • Masashi Kusakabe,
  • Katsuhiro Sano,
  • Akira Yamada,
  • Takayuki Sanomura,
  • Takayuki Kodama,
  • Takashi Koyama,
  • Manabu Minami

摘要

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) in men and to compare with those in women.

Methods

One hundred twenty-two patients (38 men and 84 women) with histologically confirmed SPNs from seven institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data, including demographics and preoperative diagnoses, were reviewed, and imaging characteristics on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were assessed. Clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between men and women.

Results

Men were significantly older than women (mean age: 43.7 years vs. 31.1 years, p < 0.001) and had smaller tumors (mean size: 28.5 mm vs. 38.5 mm, p = 0.014). Regarding preoperative diagnosis, SPN was suspected less frequently in men (p < 0.001), with a higher rate of biopsy (p = 0.006). Imaging characteristics revealed that SPNs in men had fewer hemorrhagic changes (p = 0.035), more frequent internal calcifications (p = 0.003), and a higher proportion of solid components (p = 0.009). In women, tumor size (ρ = − 0.292, p = 0.007) and the proportion of solid components (ρ = − 0.276, p = 0.011) negatively correlated with age, whereas no correlations were observed in men.

Conclusion

SPNs in men exhibit distinct clinical and imaging characteristics, including older age, smaller size, a greater proportion of solid components, and fewer degenerative features compared with those in women. Recognizing these sex-specific differences is important for improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding the optimal management of patients with SPNs.

Graphical Abstract