Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To investigate whether virtual-monoenergetic images (VMI) from dual-layer spectral-detector computed tomography (DLCT) improve right adrenal vein (RAV) assessment before adrenal venous sampling (AVS), and portal-venous-phase (PVP) images alone can replace conventional multiphase CT combining late-arterial phase (LAP) and PVP.</p> Methods <p>Sixty-three patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent LAP and PVP DLCT before AVS were retrospectively analyzed. Conventional polyenergetic-images (PEI) and VMI at 40–70&#xa0;keV (VMI<sub>40–70</sub>) were reconstructed. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of RAV were quantified. VMI with the highest CNR was predefined as the best-VMI. Two radiologists evaluated four image series (PEI and best-VMI at LAP and PVP) separately for RAV visibility, accessory hepatic vein (AHV) assessability, and image noise using five-point scales (1 = worst, 5 = best). RAV detection and AHV assessability rates were compared among image series.</p> Results <p>In both enhancement phases, VMI<sub>40–70</sub> showed lower image noise and VMI<sub>40–60</sub> higher CNR than PEI (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), with VMI<sub>40</sub> providing the highest CNR and being designated as the best VMI. Compared to PEI at LAP, CNR was lower with PEI at PVP but higher with VMI<sub>40</sub> at PVP (both, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In subjective analysis, VMI<sub>40</sub> showed better scores than PEI for image noise (LAP: 4.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6; PVP: 4.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5) and RAV visibility (LAP: 4.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.5 ± 0.8; PVP: 3.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.6 ± 0.9) (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). With PEI, the RAV detection rate was lower at PVP than at LAP (54.8% vs. 89.7%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Use of VMI<sub>40</sub> at PVP achieved the same detection rate as PEI at LAP (89.7%, <i>p</i> = 1.0) and higher AHV assessability rate than PEI at PVP (96.8% vs. 80.2%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusion <p>DLCT-VMI improved RAV assessments before AVS. Using VMI<sub>40</sub> for PVP provided RAV depiction equivalent to PEI at LAP and superior AHV assessability to PEI at PVP, suggesting its potential as a surrogate for dedicated multiphase CT.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Dual-layer spectral detector CT for improved assessment of right adrenal vein in patients with primary aldosteronism

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月18日

查看全文
  • Ryuya Yoshida,
  • Yasunori Nagayama,
  • Takumi Esaki,
  • Taiga Matsumoto,
  • Yoshitaka Tamura,
  • Soichiro Ishiuchi,
  • Taihei Inoue,
  • Daisuke Sakabe,
  • Yasuaki Igarashi,
  • Masafumi Kidoh,
  • Seitaro Oda,
  • Takeshi Nakaura,
  • Hiro Kiyosue,
  • Toshinori Hirai

摘要

Purpose

To investigate whether virtual-monoenergetic images (VMI) from dual-layer spectral-detector computed tomography (DLCT) improve right adrenal vein (RAV) assessment before adrenal venous sampling (AVS), and portal-venous-phase (PVP) images alone can replace conventional multiphase CT combining late-arterial phase (LAP) and PVP.

Methods

Sixty-three patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent LAP and PVP DLCT before AVS were retrospectively analyzed. Conventional polyenergetic-images (PEI) and VMI at 40–70 keV (VMI40–70) were reconstructed. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of RAV were quantified. VMI with the highest CNR was predefined as the best-VMI. Two radiologists evaluated four image series (PEI and best-VMI at LAP and PVP) separately for RAV visibility, accessory hepatic vein (AHV) assessability, and image noise using five-point scales (1 = worst, 5 = best). RAV detection and AHV assessability rates were compared among image series.

Results

In both enhancement phases, VMI40–70 showed lower image noise and VMI40–60 higher CNR than PEI (all p < 0.05), with VMI40 providing the highest CNR and being designated as the best VMI. Compared to PEI at LAP, CNR was lower with PEI at PVP but higher with VMI40 at PVP (both, p < 0.001). In subjective analysis, VMI40 showed better scores than PEI for image noise (LAP: 4.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6; PVP: 4.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5) and RAV visibility (LAP: 4.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.5 ± 0.8; PVP: 3.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.6 ± 0.9) (all p < 0.001). With PEI, the RAV detection rate was lower at PVP than at LAP (54.8% vs. 89.7%, p < 0.001). Use of VMI40 at PVP achieved the same detection rate as PEI at LAP (89.7%, p = 1.0) and higher AHV assessability rate than PEI at PVP (96.8% vs. 80.2%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

DLCT-VMI improved RAV assessments before AVS. Using VMI40 for PVP provided RAV depiction equivalent to PEI at LAP and superior AHV assessability to PEI at PVP, suggesting its potential as a surrogate for dedicated multiphase CT.