错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses

  • Gurkawal Kaur,
  • Smita Manchanda,
  • Raju Sharma,
  • Surabhi Vyas,
  • Devasenathipathy Kandasamy,
  • Smriti Hari,
  • Neerja Bhatla,
  • Sandeep R. Mathur

摘要

Purpose

To evaluate the role of conventional diffusion weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in distinguishing benign from malignant adnexal masses.

Methods

38 patients with 45 adnexal masses were enrolled in this prospective study and assessed with multiparametric MRI, including the IVIM-DKI sequence, on a 3 T MRI system. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from conventional DWI, the apparent diffusion coefficient derived from DKI (Dapp), the apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp), true diffusion coefficient (Dt), perfusion fraction (f) and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (Dp) were measured.

Results

The mean ADC, Dapp, and Dt were significantly higher in benign adnexal masses than in malignant adnexal masses (p < 0.001). f and Dp were also significantly higher in benign adnexal masses, with p values of 0.026 and 0.002, respectively. Kapp was higher in malignant masses (p < 0.001). Among mean ADC, Dapp, and Dt, mean ADC had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.885. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the ROCs of various diffusion parameters.

Conclusion

The mean ADC, Dapp, and Kapp are useful parameters in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Dt derived from IVIM also helps in distinguishing benign and malignant adnexal masses; however, no incremental role of IVIM and DKI over ADC could be identified in our study.

Graphical abstract