错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Staging liver fibrosis: comparison of radiomics model and fusion model based on multiparametric MRI in patients with chronic liver disease

  • Longyang Xiao,
  • Haichen Zhao,
  • Shunli Liu,
  • Wenlu Dong,
  • Yuanxiang Gao,
  • Lili Wang,
  • Baoxiang Huang,
  • Zhiming Li

摘要

Objectives

To develop and compare radiomics model and fusion model based on multiple MR parameters for staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.

Materials and methods

Patients with chronic liver disease who underwent multiparametric abdominal MRI were included in this retrospective study. Multiparametric MR images were imported into 3D-Slicer software for drawing bounding boxes on MR images. By using a 3D-Slicer extension of SlicerRadiomics, radiomics features were extracted from these MR images. The z-score normalization method was used for post-processing radiomics features. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method (LASSO) was performed for selecting significant radiomics features. The logistic regression analysis was used for building the radiomics model. A fusion model was built by integrating serum fibrosis biomarkers of aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) with radiomics signatures.

Results

In the training cohort, AUCs of radiomics and fusion model were 0.707–0.842 and 0.718–0.854 for differentiating different groups. In the testing cohort, AUCs were 0.514–0.724 and 0.609–0.728. For the training cohort, there was no significant difference of AUCs between radiomics and fusion model (p > 0.05). For the testing cohort, AUCs of fusion model were higher than those of radiomics model in differentiating F1-3 vs. F4 and F1-2 vs. F4 (p = 0.011 & 0.042).

Conclusions

Radiomics model and fusion model based on multiparametric MRI exhibited the feasibility for staging liver fibrosis in patients with CLD, and APRI and FIB-4 could improve the diagnostic performance of radiomics model in differentiating F1-3 vs. F4 and F1-2 vs. F4.