Background <p>EPOCH demonstrated superior progression free survival using yttrium-90 [<sup>90</sup>Y] glass microspheres radioembolization plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who had progressed following first-line oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Exploratory post-hoc analyses and theoretical modeling assessed the potential impact of dosimetry on safety outcomes.</p> Patients and methods <p>Liver-related treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) frequency and/or severity, and bilirubin increase were explored in participating patients. For hypothesis generation, a theoretical model was constructed to understand EPOCH dosimetry in the absence of multicompartment dosimetry data.</p> Results <p>Liver-related TEAEs were reported in 93/186 (50%) patients, TEAEs ≥ grade 3 in 44/186 (24%) patients. A total of 26/186 patients (14%) experienced a bilirubin increase TEAE of any grade, in five of which assessed as related to glass [<sup>90</sup>Y]Y-radioembolization with a median fractional tumour involvement of 2.3% (range 1.4–4.1%). Under the theoretical assumption of a T/N ratio of 2–10, most patients in EPOCH (62% had a fractional tumour involvement &lt; 10%) received a normal liver absorbed dose of at least 75 Gy. In this model, at &lt; 4.1% fractional tumour involvement, the normal liver absorbed dose approximates 120 Gy at any T/N ratio.</p> Conclusion <p>When treatment is same-day whole liver at 120 Gy average absorbed dose, the normal liver absorbed dose is dependent on fractional tumour involvement.</p> Trial Registration <p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01483027.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Post-hoc analysis of adverse events during the EPOCH trial: reconsidering dosimetry

  • Marnix Lam,
  • David Kersting,
  • William Harris,
  • Eveline Boucher,
  • Etienne Garin,
  • Kirk Fowers,
  • Riad Salem

摘要

Background

EPOCH demonstrated superior progression free survival using yttrium-90 [90Y] glass microspheres radioembolization plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who had progressed following first-line oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Exploratory post-hoc analyses and theoretical modeling assessed the potential impact of dosimetry on safety outcomes.

Patients and methods

Liver-related treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) frequency and/or severity, and bilirubin increase were explored in participating patients. For hypothesis generation, a theoretical model was constructed to understand EPOCH dosimetry in the absence of multicompartment dosimetry data.

Results

Liver-related TEAEs were reported in 93/186 (50%) patients, TEAEs ≥ grade 3 in 44/186 (24%) patients. A total of 26/186 patients (14%) experienced a bilirubin increase TEAE of any grade, in five of which assessed as related to glass [90Y]Y-radioembolization with a median fractional tumour involvement of 2.3% (range 1.4–4.1%). Under the theoretical assumption of a T/N ratio of 2–10, most patients in EPOCH (62% had a fractional tumour involvement < 10%) received a normal liver absorbed dose of at least 75 Gy. In this model, at < 4.1% fractional tumour involvement, the normal liver absorbed dose approximates 120 Gy at any T/N ratio.

Conclusion

When treatment is same-day whole liver at 120 Gy average absorbed dose, the normal liver absorbed dose is dependent on fractional tumour involvement.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01483027.