Purpose <p>To evaluate the clinical impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT versus <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), this study aims to investigate preoperative scoring criteria and establish a basis for the formulation of treatment plans tailored to this patient population.</p> Methods <p>A total of forty-one treatment-naive patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer were recruited for this study between July 2022 and February 2024. Each participant underwent both <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging. The study compared the diagnostic accuracy, PET/CT parameters, tumor staging, and the guidance provided for clinical treatment decisions by these two imaging modalities. Additionally, the tumor burden as assessed by both imaging techniques was evaluated to predict the likelihood of achieving R0 resection in subsequent surgical procedures.</p> Results <p>In the context of peritoneal metastasis, various PET/CT parameters were analyzed, including Gross Tumor Volume (GTV), SUVmax, Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG(FDG)), and Total Lesion-FAPI (TL-FAPI). The comparative analysis of the two imaging modalities revealed statistically significant differences (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT showed a higher PCI score and better sensitivity than <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (<i>P</i> = 0.03). Notably, the diagnostic accuracy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for detecting pelvic, para-aortic, and extra-abdominal lymph nodes was superior to that of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, demonstrating enhanced sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. Following the application of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, tumor stages were upgraded in 22% (9 out of 41) of patients, while 39% (16 out of 41) exhibited alterations in their PET/CT scores relative to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Furthermore, the implementation of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT influenced treatment decisions in 17.1% (7 out of 41) of cases. For patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that the GTV derived from both <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (AUC = 0.784, <i>P</i> = 0.018) and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT (AUC = 0.809, <i>P</i> = 0.010), along with TL-FAPI (AUC = 0.809, <i>P</i> = 0.010), demonstrated predictive value for incomplete resection during EOC debulking surgery.</p> Conclusion <p>In comparison to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT presents significant advantages in the detection of peritoneal and lymph node metastases, thereby providing a more accurate reference for the clinical staging of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Importantly, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT has the potential to modify treatment decisions in nearly 20% of patients, facilitating the selection of more appropriate therapeutic strategies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparative analysis of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for preoperative scoring and treatment planning

  • Meihua Wu,
  • Bing Hao,
  • Zhengyi Chen,
  • Tingting Xia,
  • Haojun Chen,
  • Qionghua Chen,
  • Jianfa Lan

摘要

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT versus 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), this study aims to investigate preoperative scoring criteria and establish a basis for the formulation of treatment plans tailored to this patient population.

Methods

A total of forty-one treatment-naive patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer were recruited for this study between July 2022 and February 2024. Each participant underwent both 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging. The study compared the diagnostic accuracy, PET/CT parameters, tumor staging, and the guidance provided for clinical treatment decisions by these two imaging modalities. Additionally, the tumor burden as assessed by both imaging techniques was evaluated to predict the likelihood of achieving R0 resection in subsequent surgical procedures.

Results

In the context of peritoneal metastasis, various PET/CT parameters were analyzed, including Gross Tumor Volume (GTV), SUVmax, Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG(FDG)), and Total Lesion-FAPI (TL-FAPI). The comparative analysis of the two imaging modalities revealed statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT showed a higher PCI score and better sensitivity than 18F-FDG PET/CT (P = 0.03). Notably, the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for detecting pelvic, para-aortic, and extra-abdominal lymph nodes was superior to that of 18F-FDG PET/CT, demonstrating enhanced sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. Following the application of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, tumor stages were upgraded in 22% (9 out of 41) of patients, while 39% (16 out of 41) exhibited alterations in their PET/CT scores relative to 18F-FDG PET/CT. Furthermore, the implementation of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT influenced treatment decisions in 17.1% (7 out of 41) of cases. For patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that the GTV derived from both 18F-FDG PET/CT (AUC = 0.784, P = 0.018) and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT (AUC = 0.809, P = 0.010), along with TL-FAPI (AUC = 0.809, P = 0.010), demonstrated predictive value for incomplete resection during EOC debulking surgery.

Conclusion

In comparison to 18F-FDG, 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT presents significant advantages in the detection of peritoneal and lymph node metastases, thereby providing a more accurate reference for the clinical staging of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Importantly, 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT has the potential to modify treatment decisions in nearly 20% of patients, facilitating the selection of more appropriate therapeutic strategies.