Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Visceral metastases are a significant risk factor and may be the most critical determinant of outcome in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT. In this monocentric real-world study, we evaluated baseline parameters derived from PET scans prior to RPT in order to identify potential prognostic factors in mCRPC patients with visceral metastases.</p> Materials and methods <p>This retrospective study included 320 men with mCRPC treated with in total 1077 cycles of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT (1–12 cycles/patient). Baseline characteristics, including age, PSA level, Gleason score, metastatic sites, and prior treatments, were evaluated as potential prognostic factors in the overall cohort. 65 patients were diagnosed with visceral metastases. In this subgroup, we analyzed the PET-derived parameters whole body PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV), SUVmax, SUVmean, miPSMA expression score and the metastatic pattern of visceral metastases.</p> Results <p>The estimated median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 15 months. Presence of visceral metastases, Gleason score, and PSA level were significant negative prognostic baseline factors for the entire cohort in the multivariate Cox regression score. The estimated median OS for patients with visceral metastases was 10 months, which was significantly lower than the 16 months observed for patients without visceral metastases. PSMA-TV, miPSMA expression score, and the metastatic pattern were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Patients exhibiting two risk factors or more demonstrated a significantly poorer OS of 4 months compared to patients with a maximum of one risk factor, who showed an OS of 15 months.</p> Conclusion <p>This study confirmed that visceral metastases represent a major risk factor in patients with mCRPC undergoing [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT. Moreover, PSMA-PET-derived parameters assessed prior to RPT enabled the distinction between high-risk and low-risk subgroups among patients with visceral metastases. These prognostic factors may therefore contribute to improved therapy stratification in mCRPC patients with visceral metastases undergoing [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

PET-imaging derived prognostic factors for prostate cancer patients with visceral metastases receiving [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月13日

查看全文
  • Magdalena Sophie Späth,
  • Helmut Dittmann,
  • Richard Spallek,
  • Eduardo Calderón,
  • Jonas Mück,
  • Andreas Brendlin,
  • Steffen Rausch,
  • Christian la Fougère,
  • Nils F. Trautwein

摘要

Introduction

Visceral metastases are a significant risk factor and may be the most critical determinant of outcome in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT. In this monocentric real-world study, we evaluated baseline parameters derived from PET scans prior to RPT in order to identify potential prognostic factors in mCRPC patients with visceral metastases.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 320 men with mCRPC treated with in total 1077 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT (1–12 cycles/patient). Baseline characteristics, including age, PSA level, Gleason score, metastatic sites, and prior treatments, were evaluated as potential prognostic factors in the overall cohort. 65 patients were diagnosed with visceral metastases. In this subgroup, we analyzed the PET-derived parameters whole body PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV), SUVmax, SUVmean, miPSMA expression score and the metastatic pattern of visceral metastases.

Results

The estimated median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 15 months. Presence of visceral metastases, Gleason score, and PSA level were significant negative prognostic baseline factors for the entire cohort in the multivariate Cox regression score. The estimated median OS for patients with visceral metastases was 10 months, which was significantly lower than the 16 months observed for patients without visceral metastases. PSMA-TV, miPSMA expression score, and the metastatic pattern were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Patients exhibiting two risk factors or more demonstrated a significantly poorer OS of 4 months compared to patients with a maximum of one risk factor, who showed an OS of 15 months.

Conclusion

This study confirmed that visceral metastases represent a major risk factor in patients with mCRPC undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT. Moreover, PSMA-PET-derived parameters assessed prior to RPT enabled the distinction between high-risk and low-risk subgroups among patients with visceral metastases. These prognostic factors may therefore contribute to improved therapy stratification in mCRPC patients with visceral metastases undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT.