Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To compare PET-derived metrics between digital and analogue PET/CT in hyperparathyroidism, and to assess whether machine learning (ML) applied to quantitative PET parameters can distinguish parathyroid adenoma (PA) from hyperplasia (PH).</p> Methods <p>From an initial multi-centre cohort of 179 patients, 86 were included, comprising 89 PET-positive lesions confirmed histologically (74 PA, 15 PH). Quantitative PET parameters—maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), target-to-background ratio (TBR), and maximum diameter—along with serum PTH and calcium levels, were compared between digital and analogue PET scanners using the Mann–Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal threshold values. ML models (LASSO, decision tree, Gaussian naïve Bayes) were trained on harmonised quantitative features to distinguish PA from PH.</p> Results <p>Digital PET detected significantly smaller lesions than analogue PET, in both metabolic volume (1.32 ± 1.39 vs. 2.36 ± 2.01&#xa0;cc; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and maximum diameter (8.35 ± 4.32 vs. 11.87 ± 5.29&#xa0;mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). PA lesions showed significantly higher SUVmax and TBR compared to PH (SUVmax: 8.58 ± 3.70 vs. 5.27 ± 2.34; TBR: 14.67 ± 6.99 vs. 8.82 ± 5.90; both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The optimal thresholds for identifying PA were SUVmax &gt; 5.89 and TBR &gt; 11.5. The best ML model (LASSO) achieved an AUC of 0.811, with 79.7% accuracy and balanced sensitivity and specificity.</p> Conclusions <p>Digital PET outperforms analogue system in detecting small parathyroid lesions. Additionally, ML analysis of PET-derived metrics and PTH may support non-invasive distinction between adenoma and hyperplasia.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Digital versus analogue PET in parathyroid imaging: comparison of PET metrics and machine learning-based characterisation of hyperfunctioning lesions (the DIGI-PET study)

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月22日

查看全文
  • Luca Filippi,
  • Francesco Bianconi,
  • Cristina Ferrari,
  • Flavia Linguanti,
  • Claudia Battisti,
  • Nicoletta Urbano,
  • Matteo Minestrini,
  • Salvatore Gerardo Messina,
  • Lisa Buci,
  • Alfonso Baldoncini,
  • Giuseppe Rubini,
  • Orazio Schillaci,
  • Barbara Palumbo

摘要

Purpose

To compare PET-derived metrics between digital and analogue PET/CT in hyperparathyroidism, and to assess whether machine learning (ML) applied to quantitative PET parameters can distinguish parathyroid adenoma (PA) from hyperplasia (PH).

Methods

From an initial multi-centre cohort of 179 patients, 86 were included, comprising 89 PET-positive lesions confirmed histologically (74 PA, 15 PH). Quantitative PET parameters—maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), target-to-background ratio (TBR), and maximum diameter—along with serum PTH and calcium levels, were compared between digital and analogue PET scanners using the Mann–Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal threshold values. ML models (LASSO, decision tree, Gaussian naïve Bayes) were trained on harmonised quantitative features to distinguish PA from PH.

Results

Digital PET detected significantly smaller lesions than analogue PET, in both metabolic volume (1.32 ± 1.39 vs. 2.36 ± 2.01 cc; p < 0.001) and maximum diameter (8.35 ± 4.32 vs. 11.87 ± 5.29 mm; p < 0.001). PA lesions showed significantly higher SUVmax and TBR compared to PH (SUVmax: 8.58 ± 3.70 vs. 5.27 ± 2.34; TBR: 14.67 ± 6.99 vs. 8.82 ± 5.90; both p < 0.001). The optimal thresholds for identifying PA were SUVmax > 5.89 and TBR > 11.5. The best ML model (LASSO) achieved an AUC of 0.811, with 79.7% accuracy and balanced sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions

Digital PET outperforms analogue system in detecting small parathyroid lesions. Additionally, ML analysis of PET-derived metrics and PTH may support non-invasive distinction between adenoma and hyperplasia.