Background and aim <p>The positive detection rate of MRI in autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) patients is low, often failing to make a rapid and accurate localization diagnosis. Both <sup>18</sup>F-DPA714 and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET imaging techniques have shown their advantages in the diagnosis of AIE. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic value between <sup>18</sup>F-DPA714 and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in patients with AIE.</p> Methods <p>This cross-sectional study included 23 antibody-positive and 2 possible antibody-negative AIE patients, along with 10 healthy controls. All patients underwent sequential <sup>18</sup>F-DPA714 PET/MRI and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT examinations within one week. A follow-up of 6 to 12&#xa0;months after the baseline examinations was performed to assess the change of patients' clinical symptoms. Positive findings for <sup>18</sup>F-DPA714 PET were defined as Z-score above 2.0 in the corresponding brain regions of healthy controls. Positive results for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET were indicated by the Z-score above 2.0 or below -2.0 obtained after comparison with the normal population database.</p> Results <p>Both <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET and <sup>18</sup>F-DPA714 PET showed higher positivity rates than MRI (81% vs 44%, <i>P</i> = 0.006 and 76% vs 44%, <i>P</i> = 0.008, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between the uptake intensity and extent of <sup>18</sup>F-DPA714 but not <sup>18</sup>F-FDG with the mRS scores and the CASE scores. Patients with epilepsy showed a significantly higher uptake in the whole-cortex of both <sup>18</sup>F-DPA714 (<i>P</i> = 0.0014) and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (<i>P</i> = 0.0051) and in the temporal lobe of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (<i>P</i> = 0.0216) compared to those patients without. Higher <sup>18</sup>F-DPA714 SUVR (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and lower <sup>18</sup>F-FDG SUVR (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) in the whole-cortex of patients with long-term cognitive impairment than those patients without were observed.</p> Conclusion <p><sup>18</sup>F-DPA714 PET showed its better correlation with disease severity of AIE than <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET, serving as a supplementary tool to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET and MRI.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of 18F-DPA714 PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with autoimmune encephalitis: a cross-sectional study

  • Huanyu Meng,
  • Xiaoyu Chen,
  • Lu He,
  • Hangxing Chunyu,
  • Qinming Zhou,
  • Jin Wang,
  • Qian Qu,
  • Wangxi Hai,
  • Yu Zhang,
  • Biao Li,
  • Sheng Chen,
  • Min Zhang

摘要

Background and aim

The positive detection rate of MRI in autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) patients is low, often failing to make a rapid and accurate localization diagnosis. Both 18F-DPA714 and 18F-FDG PET imaging techniques have shown their advantages in the diagnosis of AIE. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic value between 18F-DPA714 and 18F-FDG PET in patients with AIE.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 23 antibody-positive and 2 possible antibody-negative AIE patients, along with 10 healthy controls. All patients underwent sequential 18F-DPA714 PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations within one week. A follow-up of 6 to 12 months after the baseline examinations was performed to assess the change of patients' clinical symptoms. Positive findings for 18F-DPA714 PET were defined as Z-score above 2.0 in the corresponding brain regions of healthy controls. Positive results for 18F-FDG PET were indicated by the Z-score above 2.0 or below -2.0 obtained after comparison with the normal population database.

Results

Both 18F-FDG PET and 18F-DPA714 PET showed higher positivity rates than MRI (81% vs 44%, P = 0.006 and 76% vs 44%, P = 0.008, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between the uptake intensity and extent of 18F-DPA714 but not 18F-FDG with the mRS scores and the CASE scores. Patients with epilepsy showed a significantly higher uptake in the whole-cortex of both 18F-DPA714 (P = 0.0014) and 18F-FDG (P = 0.0051) and in the temporal lobe of 18F-FDG (P = 0.0216) compared to those patients without. Higher 18F-DPA714 SUVR (P < 0.001) and lower 18F-FDG SUVR (P < 0.001) in the whole-cortex of patients with long-term cognitive impairment than those patients without were observed.

Conclusion

18F-DPA714 PET showed its better correlation with disease severity of AIE than 18F-FDG PET, serving as a supplementary tool to 18F-FDG PET and MRI.