Scholarlink

Objective <p>To evaluate the ability of weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) to detect and quantify differences in anterior tibial translation (ATT) and tibiofemoral rotation (TFR) between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured and uninjured knees in patients with chronic ACL tears.</p> Materials and Methods <p>This prospective, observational study included 20 patients (40 knees) with chronic unilateral ACL injuries confirmed by clinical exam and MRI. Knee WBCT was performed in four standardized positions: full extension and 30° flexion (bipodal), and internal and external rotation (unipodal). ATT was measured in medial and lateral compartments. TFR was assessed using two angular parameters: femorotibial rotation angle (TFR 1) and trochlear groove–patellar tendon angle (TFR 2). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p> Results <p>WBCT detected significant differences in ATT and TFR between injured and uninjured knees during bipodal loading. At 30° flexion, lateral ATT was greater in injured knees (7.9 ± 3.8&#xa0;mm vs. 4.7 ± 2.0&#xa0;mm, <i>p</i> = 0.001), as was medial ATT (2.9 ± 2.9&#xa0;mm vs. 0.8 ± 1.4&#xa0;mm, <i>p</i> = 0.007). TFR 1 was increased (10.9° ± 6.3° vs. 7.6° ± 4.6°, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), while TFR 2 was decreased (12.3° ± 7.2° vs. 17.3° ± 6.1°, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Similar trends were seen in full extension. Under unipodal loading, only lateral ATT remained significantly elevated. All measures showed good to excellent reliability (ICC &gt; 0.7).</p> Conclusion <p>WBCT enables objective quantification of ATT and TFR differences in chronic ACL injury and may support biomechanical assessment in clinical practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Quantifying anterior tibial translation and rotation in chronic ACL-deficient knees: a prospective, observational study using weight-bearing CT

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月8日

查看全文
  • Sandro Ricardo Benites Zelada,
  • Renata Vidal Leão,
  • Andre Giardino Moreira da Silva,
  • Carlos Felipe Teixeira Lobo,
  • Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos,
  • Paulo Victor Partezani Helito,
  • Camilo Partezani Helito,
  • Riccardo Gomes Gobbi

摘要

Objective

To evaluate the ability of weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) to detect and quantify differences in anterior tibial translation (ATT) and tibiofemoral rotation (TFR) between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured and uninjured knees in patients with chronic ACL tears.

Materials and Methods

This prospective, observational study included 20 patients (40 knees) with chronic unilateral ACL injuries confirmed by clinical exam and MRI. Knee WBCT was performed in four standardized positions: full extension and 30° flexion (bipodal), and internal and external rotation (unipodal). ATT was measured in medial and lateral compartments. TFR was assessed using two angular parameters: femorotibial rotation angle (TFR 1) and trochlear groove–patellar tendon angle (TFR 2). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results

WBCT detected significant differences in ATT and TFR between injured and uninjured knees during bipodal loading. At 30° flexion, lateral ATT was greater in injured knees (7.9 ± 3.8 mm vs. 4.7 ± 2.0 mm, p = 0.001), as was medial ATT (2.9 ± 2.9 mm vs. 0.8 ± 1.4 mm, p = 0.007). TFR 1 was increased (10.9° ± 6.3° vs. 7.6° ± 4.6°, p < 0.001), while TFR 2 was decreased (12.3° ± 7.2° vs. 17.3° ± 6.1°, p = 0.004). Similar trends were seen in full extension. Under unipodal loading, only lateral ATT remained significantly elevated. All measures showed good to excellent reliability (ICC > 0.7).

Conclusion

WBCT enables objective quantification of ATT and TFR differences in chronic ACL injury and may support biomechanical assessment in clinical practice.