Background <p>Focused abbreviated survey technique (FAST) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (i.e., sedation-free abbreviated MRI) is progressively being implemented in the daily clinical practice of multiple pediatric institutions for neuroimaging assessment of children presenting with neurological disorders.</p> Objective <p>To survey current awareness, imaging practices, and perception of members of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology (ESPR) regarding pediatric FAST brain MRI.</p> Materials and methods <p>A survey consisting of seven questions related to FAST brain MRI was distributed electronically to all ESPR members.</p> Results <p>A total of 64 responses from 27 different countries (17 of which were European) were received, corresponding to a 4% response rate. Among responders, 68% were full-time pediatric radiologists and the great majority (94%) were aware of current clinical use of FAST brain MRI in the pediatric setting. Moreover, 83% already apply this imaging approach in daily work activity, more commonly for a few years (85%). The most cited advantage for adopting this imaging approach was radiation risk reduction (95%). Major reported obstacles to routine implementation were technical/human resource limitations (63%), potential medicolegal implications (55%), and lower image quality reducing diagnostic accuracy (53%). Diverse protocols are used, including utilization of inhouse/custom developed solutions (68%) or one of multiple commercially available/published protocols (17%), or both (15%). Near all participants (97%) expressed desire for formal consensus recommendations from the ESPR on the topic.</p> Conclusion <p>Despite widespread knowledge and high clinical adoption rate of pediatric FAST brain MRI among participants, clinical indications/protocols remain variable and some barriers persist in the daily practice, highlighting the need for evidence-based consensus-driven guidelines.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Focused Abbreviated Survey Technique (FAST) brain magnetic resonance imaging in children: results from a European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey

  • Ana Filipa Geraldo,
  • Felice D’Arco,
  • Maria I. Argyropoulou,
  • Jordi Muchart,
  • Antrea Zouvani,
  • Volodia Dangouloff-Ros,
  • Selma Sirin,
  • Savvas Andronikou

摘要

Background

Focused abbreviated survey technique (FAST) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (i.e., sedation-free abbreviated MRI) is progressively being implemented in the daily clinical practice of multiple pediatric institutions for neuroimaging assessment of children presenting with neurological disorders.

Objective

To survey current awareness, imaging practices, and perception of members of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology (ESPR) regarding pediatric FAST brain MRI.

Materials and methods

A survey consisting of seven questions related to FAST brain MRI was distributed electronically to all ESPR members.

Results

A total of 64 responses from 27 different countries (17 of which were European) were received, corresponding to a 4% response rate. Among responders, 68% were full-time pediatric radiologists and the great majority (94%) were aware of current clinical use of FAST brain MRI in the pediatric setting. Moreover, 83% already apply this imaging approach in daily work activity, more commonly for a few years (85%). The most cited advantage for adopting this imaging approach was radiation risk reduction (95%). Major reported obstacles to routine implementation were technical/human resource limitations (63%), potential medicolegal implications (55%), and lower image quality reducing diagnostic accuracy (53%). Diverse protocols are used, including utilization of inhouse/custom developed solutions (68%) or one of multiple commercially available/published protocols (17%), or both (15%). Near all participants (97%) expressed desire for formal consensus recommendations from the ESPR on the topic.

Conclusion

Despite widespread knowledge and high clinical adoption rate of pediatric FAST brain MRI among participants, clinical indications/protocols remain variable and some barriers persist in the daily practice, highlighting the need for evidence-based consensus-driven guidelines.

Graphical Abstract