Reply to the comments on “Effect of Bedside Ultrasound‑Guided Versus Fluoroscopy‑Guided Transvenous Cardiac Temporary Pacing in Children with Bradyarrhythmia”

The article “Effect of Bedside Ultrasound‑Guided Versus Fluoroscopy‑Guided Transvenous Cardiac Temporary Pacing in Children with Bradyarrhythmia” offers valuable insights into comparative short-term pacing strategies for pediatric bradyarrhythmias. There are some comments that the study overlooks the impact of genetic factors on bradyarrhythmias and treatment outcomes, lacks detailed information on the influence of medications, and does not address the cost-effectiveness of the pacing techniques. The analysis and explanation are made here, and it is hoped that through further research in the future, the conclusions will be more reliable.