A closer look at Hamiltonicity and domination through the lens of diameter and convexity
摘要
A bipartite graph G(X, Y) is called a star-convex bipartite graph with convexity on X if there is an associated star T(X, F), such that for each vertex in Y, its neighborhood in X induces a subtree in T. A graph G is said to be a split graph if G can be partitioned into a clique (K) and an independent set (I). The objective of this study is twofold: (i) to strengthen the complexity results presented in Chen et al. (J Comb Optim 32(1):95–110, 2016) for the Hamiltonian cycle (HCYCLE), the Hamiltonian path (HPATH), and the Domination (DS) problems on star-convex bipartite graphs (ii) to reinforce the results of Müller (Discret Math 156(1–3):291–298, 1996) for HCYCLE, and HPATH on split graphs by introducing a convex ordering on one of the partitions (K or I). As part of our fine-grained analysis study with the diameter being the parameter, we first show that the diameter of star-convex bipartite graphs is at most six. Next, we observe that the reduction instances of Chen et al. (J Comb Optim 32(1):95–110, 2016) are star-convex bipartite graphs with at most diameter 4, and hence HCYCLE and HPATH are NP-complete on star-convex bipartite graphs with at most diameter 4. We strengthen this result and establish the following results on star-convex bipartite graphs: (i) HCYCLE is NP-complete for diameter 3, and polynomial-time solvable for diameters 2, 5, and 6 (a transformation in complexity: P to NPC to P) (ii) HPATH is polynomial-time solvable for diameter 2, and NP-Complete, otherwise (a dichotomy). Further, with convexity being the parameter, for split graphs with convexity on K (resp. I), we show that HCYCLE and HPATH are NP-complete on star-convex (resp. comb) split graphs with convexity on K (resp. I). Further, we show that HCYCLE is NP-complete on