Scholarlink

Background and purpose <p>Emissary veins (EVs) are common incidental radiological findings, and enlarged EVs have been associated with the development of pulsatile tinnitus (PT). The purpose of this study is to further investigate the prevalence and characteristics of EVs in patients with and without PT.</p> Materials and methods <p>We conducted a case-control study of consecutive patients with PT and age- and sex-matched controls who received imaging (primarily CTA, CTV, and MRI) between February 2018 and February 2022. Radiological evaluation was performed by two neuroradiologists and EVs measurements were performed at the point of maximal diameter. For statistical analyses, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare vein diameters, and Fisher’s exact test was used to compare vein frequencies.</p> Results <p>Condylar and mastoid emissary veins of any diameter were less frequently observed in patients with PT than controls (66% vs. 78%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The median diameter of mastoid emissary veins (MEVs) was significantly greater in the PT cohort (1 [IQR 1–2] mm vs. 1 [1–1] mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) but there was no difference in median condylar emissary vein (CEV) diameter (3 [2–4] mm vs. 2 [2-3.5] mm; <i>p</i> = 0.64). Dilated CEVs (≥ 5&#xa0;mm, 11% vs. 4%; <i>p</i> = 0.02) and MEVs (≥ 2&#xa0;mm, 30% vs. 13%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) were more common in patients with PT. In both the PT and control cohorts, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of dilated EVs in patients with and without significant internal jugular stenosis (IJVS), transverse sinus stenosis (TSS). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of dilated EVs in patients with and without idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in the PT cohort.</p> Conclusion <p>Dilated CEVs and MEVs were more common in patients with PT compared to controls, while the overall prevalence of CEVs/MEVs was lower in the control cohort.There was no association between the prevalence of dilated EVs and the presence of significant IJVS or TSS in patients with PT or controls.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Dilated emissary veins in patients with pulsatile tinnitus: Culprit or bystander?

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月12日

查看全文
  • Benjamin Soares,
  • Piers Klein,
  • Bindu N Setty,
  • Zhongyuang Zhang,
  • Pamela Semaan,
  • Thanh N Nguyen,
  • Mohamad Abdalkader

摘要

Background and purpose

Emissary veins (EVs) are common incidental radiological findings, and enlarged EVs have been associated with the development of pulsatile tinnitus (PT). The purpose of this study is to further investigate the prevalence and characteristics of EVs in patients with and without PT.

Materials and methods

We conducted a case-control study of consecutive patients with PT and age- and sex-matched controls who received imaging (primarily CTA, CTV, and MRI) between February 2018 and February 2022. Radiological evaluation was performed by two neuroradiologists and EVs measurements were performed at the point of maximal diameter. For statistical analyses, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare vein diameters, and Fisher’s exact test was used to compare vein frequencies.

Results

Condylar and mastoid emissary veins of any diameter were less frequently observed in patients with PT than controls (66% vs. 78%; p < 0.01). The median diameter of mastoid emissary veins (MEVs) was significantly greater in the PT cohort (1 [IQR 1–2] mm vs. 1 [1–1] mm; p < 0.01) but there was no difference in median condylar emissary vein (CEV) diameter (3 [2–4] mm vs. 2 [2-3.5] mm; p = 0.64). Dilated CEVs (≥ 5 mm, 11% vs. 4%; p = 0.02) and MEVs (≥ 2 mm, 30% vs. 13%; p < 0.01) were more common in patients with PT. In both the PT and control cohorts, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of dilated EVs in patients with and without significant internal jugular stenosis (IJVS), transverse sinus stenosis (TSS). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of dilated EVs in patients with and without idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in the PT cohort.

Conclusion

Dilated CEVs and MEVs were more common in patients with PT compared to controls, while the overall prevalence of CEVs/MEVs was lower in the control cohort.There was no association between the prevalence of dilated EVs and the presence of significant IJVS or TSS in patients with PT or controls.