Background <p>The World Health Organization recommends cohort event monitoring with a 30-day follow-up period for vaccine safety surveillance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, in resource-limited settings, operational and logistical constraints necessitate evaluation of the efficiency and feasibility of this follow-up duration.</p> Methods <p>We conducted an analysis of a prospective active surveillance study of 10,948 adults who received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Ethiopia (August 2021–June 2022), using immediate observation and telephone follow-up on days 2, 4, 7, 14, 21, and 30.</p> Results <p>Among 10,948 participants, 4,236 (38.7%; 95% CI: 37.8–39.6%) reported at least one adverse event following immunisation (AEFI), with 6,174 total events recorded. Of all events, 88.2% were detected within 48&#xa0;h (1.8% immediate, 86.4% at day 2), while 11.8% were identified during subsequent follow-up between days 4 and 30. Seven reactogenic symptoms comprised 93.8% of AEFIs. No serious AEFIs or adverse events of special interest were identified. Over nine months, 138 healthcare professionals captured predominantly mild, expected reactions through extended surveillance.</p> Conclusions <p>Most COVID-19 vaccine adverse events in Ethiopia occurred within 48&#xa0;h of vaccination, empirically suggesting that extended full-cohort CEM could yield diminishing informational returns in low- and middle-income country settings. A hybrid surveillance approach combining intensive short-term active surveillance during the first 48&#xa0;h, enhanced passive reporting, and sentinel hospital networks with adequate diagnostic capacity could offer a more sustainable and operationally realistic framework. These findings are offered as an evidence-based reference for national regulatory authorities planning or conducting emergency vaccine safety surveillance in comparable contexts, supporting a transition from product-centred extended monitoring towards patient-centred, resource-adapted pharmacovigilance.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Most COVID-19 vaccine adverse events detected within 48 hours in Ethiopia: implications for cohort event monitoring efficiency in resource-limited settings

  • Tigist Dires Gebreyesus,
  • Teshita Shute,
  • Asnakech Alemu,
  • Alemseged Beyene Berha,
  • Mehiret Maru,
  • Habtamu Gashaw,
  • Meron Kifle,
  • Julie Doherty,
  • Albert Figueras

摘要

Background

The World Health Organization recommends cohort event monitoring with a 30-day follow-up period for vaccine safety surveillance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, in resource-limited settings, operational and logistical constraints necessitate evaluation of the efficiency and feasibility of this follow-up duration.

Methods

We conducted an analysis of a prospective active surveillance study of 10,948 adults who received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Ethiopia (August 2021–June 2022), using immediate observation and telephone follow-up on days 2, 4, 7, 14, 21, and 30.

Results

Among 10,948 participants, 4,236 (38.7%; 95% CI: 37.8–39.6%) reported at least one adverse event following immunisation (AEFI), with 6,174 total events recorded. Of all events, 88.2% were detected within 48 h (1.8% immediate, 86.4% at day 2), while 11.8% were identified during subsequent follow-up between days 4 and 30. Seven reactogenic symptoms comprised 93.8% of AEFIs. No serious AEFIs or adverse events of special interest were identified. Over nine months, 138 healthcare professionals captured predominantly mild, expected reactions through extended surveillance.

Conclusions

Most COVID-19 vaccine adverse events in Ethiopia occurred within 48 h of vaccination, empirically suggesting that extended full-cohort CEM could yield diminishing informational returns in low- and middle-income country settings. A hybrid surveillance approach combining intensive short-term active surveillance during the first 48 h, enhanced passive reporting, and sentinel hospital networks with adequate diagnostic capacity could offer a more sustainable and operationally realistic framework. These findings are offered as an evidence-based reference for national regulatory authorities planning or conducting emergency vaccine safety surveillance in comparable contexts, supporting a transition from product-centred extended monitoring towards patient-centred, resource-adapted pharmacovigilance.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.