<p>We study the relations between Blot–Shadrin–Singh tautological relation and the DR formula for Hodge character class <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\,\textrm{ch}\,}}_{2g-1}(\mathbb {E})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mtext>ch</mtext> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>g</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">E</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{g}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mover> <mi mathvariant="script">M</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mi>g</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In particular, we prove the equivalence between Blot–Shadrin–Singh tautological relation on <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{g,1}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mover> <mi mathvariant="script">M</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and the DR formula for Hodge character class <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\,\textrm{ch}\,}}_{2g-1}(\mathbb {E})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mtext>ch</mtext> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>g</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">E</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{g}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mover> <mi mathvariant="script">M</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mi>g</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. As two applications, we first find a new push-forward tautological relation on <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{g+1}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mover> <mi mathvariant="script">M</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(g\ge 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, which extends the Liu-Pandharipande relation to a lower degree. Second, we obtain a new partial differential equation for higher genus descendant Gromov–Witten invariants of any smooth projective variety.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

New Push-Forward Relation and Universal Equation for Higher Genus Gromov–Witten invariants

  • Xin Wang

摘要

We study the relations between Blot–Shadrin–Singh tautological relation and the DR formula for Hodge character class \({{\,\textrm{ch}\,}}_{2g-1}(\mathbb {E})\) ch 2 g - 1 ( E ) on \(\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{g}\) M ¯ g . In particular, we prove the equivalence between Blot–Shadrin–Singh tautological relation on \(\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{g,1}\) M ¯ g , 1 and the DR formula for Hodge character class \({{\,\textrm{ch}\,}}_{2g-1}(\mathbb {E})\) ch 2 g - 1 ( E ) on \(\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{g}\) M ¯ g . As two applications, we first find a new push-forward tautological relation on \(\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{g+1}\) M ¯ g + 1 for \(g\ge 1\) g 1 , which extends the Liu-Pandharipande relation to a lower degree. Second, we obtain a new partial differential equation for higher genus descendant Gromov–Witten invariants of any smooth projective variety.