Scholarlink

<p>This study examines the German Pharmacological Society (DGP) during the Nazi Regime (1933-1945) and its resurrection&#xa0;after World War II. The analysis is based on DGPT documents stored in the archives of Hannover Medical School&#xa0;and published in <i>Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol</i>. The minutes of board meetings were a key source of information. Selected&#xa0;individuals who played an important role during this timeare briefly presented biographically&#xa0;and scientifically, and their positions are explained. These individuals are Behrend Behrens, Otto Riesser, Hellmut Weese, Wolfgang Heubner, Ferdinand Flury, Otto Loewi, and Otto Krayer. The study focuses on the DGP’s treatment of its Jewish members—both during and after World War II. It examines the extent to which the professional association in post-war Germany took a position on its actions or inaction at that time. In 1931/32, 18% of the DGP members were Jewish. We identified 23 additional DGP members persecuted by the Nazis not yet known through previous studies. They will be analyzed and honored in detail in a future study.&#xa0;In order to classify the behavior of the DGP, a brief comparison with other professional associations (pediatrics and gynecology)&#xa0;is also made. Our study shows that the DGP has not come to terms with its past behavior during the Nazi era until recently. Although Jewish members were not explicitly excluded from the professional association, which distinguishes the DGP from other professional associations, there are indications of vehement representatives of Nazi ideology (e.g., Ferdinand Flury)&#xa0;within the professional association. The DGP board never officially contradicted these openly professed supporters of Nazism after the Nazis came to power. There are also indications of a certain political calculation to quickly establish ties with the scientific community, which ultimately succeeded. This context explains that Otto Riesser, persecuted during the Nazi era, was elected as the first DGP chairman after the war.&#xa0;Although Prof. Dr. Ursula Gundert-Remy&#xa0;issued an official apology in 2014 for the&#xa0;behavior of the DGP&#xa0;toward Jewish members, it remains unclear why this acknowledgment came so late.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The German Pharmacological Society during the Nazi regime (1933–1945) and its resurrection after World War II

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月1日

查看全文
  • Nina Sophie Goebels,
  • Christine Wolters,
  • Roland Seifert

摘要

This study examines the German Pharmacological Society (DGP) during the Nazi Regime (1933-1945) and its resurrection after World War II. The analysis is based on DGPT documents stored in the archives of Hannover Medical School and published in Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. The minutes of board meetings were a key source of information. Selected individuals who played an important role during this timeare briefly presented biographically and scientifically, and their positions are explained. These individuals are Behrend Behrens, Otto Riesser, Hellmut Weese, Wolfgang Heubner, Ferdinand Flury, Otto Loewi, and Otto Krayer. The study focuses on the DGP’s treatment of its Jewish members—both during and after World War II. It examines the extent to which the professional association in post-war Germany took a position on its actions or inaction at that time. In 1931/32, 18% of the DGP members were Jewish. We identified 23 additional DGP members persecuted by the Nazis not yet known through previous studies. They will be analyzed and honored in detail in a future study. In order to classify the behavior of the DGP, a brief comparison with other professional associations (pediatrics and gynecology) is also made. Our study shows that the DGP has not come to terms with its past behavior during the Nazi era until recently. Although Jewish members were not explicitly excluded from the professional association, which distinguishes the DGP from other professional associations, there are indications of vehement representatives of Nazi ideology (e.g., Ferdinand Flury) within the professional association. The DGP board never officially contradicted these openly professed supporters of Nazism after the Nazis came to power. There are also indications of a certain political calculation to quickly establish ties with the scientific community, which ultimately succeeded. This context explains that Otto Riesser, persecuted during the Nazi era, was elected as the first DGP chairman after the war. Although Prof. Dr. Ursula Gundert-Remy issued an official apology in 2014 for the behavior of the DGP toward Jewish members, it remains unclear why this acknowledgment came so late.