Scholarlink

<p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of perampanel (PER) as adjunctive therapy in patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS), focusing on seizure outcomes and adverse events (AEs). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to June 2025. Clinical trials and observational studies assessing PER in LGS patients were included. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Bias was assessed using RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, and NOS tools. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to estimate pooled incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was quantified using I<sup>2</sup> and chi-square tests. Six studies involving 247 LGS patients were included. The pooled responder rate (≥ 50% seizure reduction) was 50.0% (95% CI: 32.1%–67.9%), while seizure freedom was achieved in 9.8% (95% CI: 6.7%–26.3%). Seizure aggravation occurred in 5.3% (95% CI: 1.4%–12.0%). Discontinuation due to lack of efficacy and safety concerns was reported in 21.9% (95% CI: 8.1%–35.6%) and 11.0% (95% CI: 5.8%–16.2%), respectively. Behavioral AEs included irritability (13.7%), aggression (11.4%), and general behavioral changes (24.7%). PER demonstrates notable efficacy in reducing seizures in LGS, with a responder rate of 50%. While complete seizure freedom remains infrequent overall, a nearly 10% seizure freedom rate is clinically meaningful in this challenging context. Behavioral AEs are common and led to discontinuation in over 10% of cases. PER may serve as a second- or third-line adjunctive therapy, warranting individualized risk–benefit evaluation and close monitoring.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effectiveness and safety of perampanel in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月4日

查看全文
  • Danisha Kumar,
  • Haneen Sabet,
  • Amr Elshahat,
  • Mohamed El-Moslemani,
  • Abdelfattah Arafa,
  • Mahmoud G. A. Saleh,
  • Sama Mahmoud Gamal,
  • Abdallah Abbas

摘要

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of perampanel (PER) as adjunctive therapy in patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS), focusing on seizure outcomes and adverse events (AEs). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to June 2025. Clinical trials and observational studies assessing PER in LGS patients were included. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Bias was assessed using RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, and NOS tools. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to estimate pooled incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was quantified using I2 and chi-square tests. Six studies involving 247 LGS patients were included. The pooled responder rate (≥ 50% seizure reduction) was 50.0% (95% CI: 32.1%–67.9%), while seizure freedom was achieved in 9.8% (95% CI: 6.7%–26.3%). Seizure aggravation occurred in 5.3% (95% CI: 1.4%–12.0%). Discontinuation due to lack of efficacy and safety concerns was reported in 21.9% (95% CI: 8.1%–35.6%) and 11.0% (95% CI: 5.8%–16.2%), respectively. Behavioral AEs included irritability (13.7%), aggression (11.4%), and general behavioral changes (24.7%). PER demonstrates notable efficacy in reducing seizures in LGS, with a responder rate of 50%. While complete seizure freedom remains infrequent overall, a nearly 10% seizure freedom rate is clinically meaningful in this challenging context. Behavioral AEs are common and led to discontinuation in over 10% of cases. PER may serve as a second- or third-line adjunctive therapy, warranting individualized risk–benefit evaluation and close monitoring.