<p>Let <i>A</i> be an abelian variety defined over <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {Q}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Q</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and of dimension <i>g</i>. Assume that, for each sufficiently large prime <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ell \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ℓ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <i>A</i> has a surjective residual modulo <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ell \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ℓ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Galois representation. For <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t\in {\mathbb {Z}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(x&gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, denote by <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi _A(x, t)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>π</mi> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> the number of primes <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p \le x\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for which the Frobenius trace <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(a_{1, p}(A)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> associated to <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A (\text {mod}p)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>mod</mtext> <mi>p</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> equals <i>t</i>. Assuming the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis for Dedekind zeta functions (GRH), we obtain that <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi _A(x, 0) \ll _A x^{1 - \frac{1}{2g^2+g+1}}/(\text {log}x)^{1 - \frac{2}{2g^2+g+1}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>π</mi> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mo>≪</mo> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <msup> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>log</mtext> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi _A(x, t) \ll _A x^{1 - \frac{1}{2g^2+g+2}}/(\text {log}x)^{1 - \frac{2}{2g^2+g+2}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>π</mi> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mo>≪</mo> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <msup> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>log</mtext> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> if <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t \ne 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>≠</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and deduce that almost all primes <i>p</i> satisfy <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(|a_{1, p}(A)| &gt; p^{\frac{1}{2 g^2 + g + 1}}/ (\text {log}p)^{\frac{2}{2g^2+g+1}+\varepsilon }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mo>&gt;</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>log</mtext> <mi>p</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mfrac> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo>+</mo> <mi>ε</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for any <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varepsilon &gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ε</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Assuming, in addition to GRH, Artin’s Holomorphy Conjecture and a Pair Correlation Conjecture for Artin L-functions, we obtain that <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi _A(x, 0) \ll _A x^{1 - \frac{1}{g+1}}/(\text {log}x)^{1 - \frac{4}{g+1}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>π</mi> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mo>≪</mo> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <msup> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>log</mtext> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>4</mn> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi _A(x, t) \ll _A x^{1 - \frac{1}{g+2}}/(\text {log}x)^{1 - \frac{4}{g+2}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>π</mi> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mo>≪</mo> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <msup> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>log</mtext> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>4</mn> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> if <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t \ne 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>≠</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and deduce that almost all primes <i>p</i> satisfy <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(|a_{1, p}(A)|&gt; p^{\frac{1}{g + 2} - \varepsilon }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mo>&gt;</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mrow> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo>-</mo> <mi>ε</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for any <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varepsilon &gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ε</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Bounds for the distribution of the Frobenius traces associated to a generic abelian variety

  • Alina Carmen Cojocaru,
  • Tian Wang

摘要

Let A be an abelian variety defined over \({\mathbb {Q}}\) Q and of dimension g. Assume that, for each sufficiently large prime \(\ell \) , A has a surjective residual modulo \(\ell \) Galois representation. For \(t\in {\mathbb {Z}}\) t Z and \(x>0\) x > 0 , denote by \(\pi _A(x, t)\) π A ( x , t ) the number of primes \(p \le x\) p x for which the Frobenius trace \(a_{1, p}(A)\) a 1 , p ( A ) associated to \(A (\text {mod}p)\) A ( mod p ) equals t. Assuming the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis for Dedekind zeta functions (GRH), we obtain that \(\pi _A(x, 0) \ll _A x^{1 - \frac{1}{2g^2+g+1}}/(\text {log}x)^{1 - \frac{2}{2g^2+g+1}}\) π A ( x , 0 ) A x 1 - 1 2 g 2 + g + 1 / ( log x ) 1 - 2 2 g 2 + g + 1 and \(\pi _A(x, t) \ll _A x^{1 - \frac{1}{2g^2+g+2}}/(\text {log}x)^{1 - \frac{2}{2g^2+g+2}}\) π A ( x , t ) A x 1 - 1 2 g 2 + g + 2 / ( log x ) 1 - 2 2 g 2 + g + 2 if \(t \ne 0\) t 0 , and deduce that almost all primes p satisfy \(|a_{1, p}(A)| > p^{\frac{1}{2 g^2 + g + 1}}/ (\text {log}p)^{\frac{2}{2g^2+g+1}+\varepsilon }\) | a 1 , p ( A ) | > p 1 2 g 2 + g + 1 / ( log p ) 2 2 g 2 + g + 1 + ε for any \(\varepsilon >0\) ε > 0 . Assuming, in addition to GRH, Artin’s Holomorphy Conjecture and a Pair Correlation Conjecture for Artin L-functions, we obtain that \(\pi _A(x, 0) \ll _A x^{1 - \frac{1}{g+1}}/(\text {log}x)^{1 - \frac{4}{g+1}}\) π A ( x , 0 ) A x 1 - 1 g + 1 / ( log x ) 1 - 4 g + 1 and \(\pi _A(x, t) \ll _A x^{1 - \frac{1}{g+2}}/(\text {log}x)^{1 - \frac{4}{g+2}}\) π A ( x , t ) A x 1 - 1 g + 2 / ( log x ) 1 - 4 g + 2 if \(t \ne 0\) t 0 , and deduce that almost all primes p satisfy \(|a_{1, p}(A)|> p^{\frac{1}{g + 2} - \varepsilon }\) | a 1 , p ( A ) | > p 1 g + 2 - ε for any \(\varepsilon >0\) ε > 0 .