<p>It was conjectured by Bergelson et al. (Geom Funct Anal 19(6):1539–1596, 2010) that every Host–Kra <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {F}_p^\omega \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>ω</mi> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-system of order <i>k</i> is an Abramov system of order <i>k</i>. This conjecture has been verified for <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k \le p+1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In this paper we show that the conjecture fails when <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k=5, p=2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We in fact establish a stronger (combinatorial) statement, in that we produce a bounded function <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(f: \mathbb {F}_2^n \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of large Gowers norm <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Vert f\Vert _{U^6(\mathbb {F}_2^n)}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <msup> <mi>U</mi> <mn>6</mn> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> which (as per the inverse theorem for that norm) correlates with a non-classical quintic phase polynomial <i>e</i>(<i>P</i>), but with the property that all such phase polynomials <i>e</i>(<i>P</i>) are “non-measurable” in the sense that they cannot be well approximated by functions of a bounded number of random translates of <i>f</i>. A simpler version of our construction can also be used to answer a question of Candela et al. (Ergodic Theory Dyn Syst 43(12):3971–4040, 2023).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Host–Kra \(\mathbb {F}_2^\omega \)-system of order 5 that is not Abramov of order 5, and non-measurability of the inverse theorem for the \(U^6(\mathbb {F}_2^n)\) norm

  • Asgar Jamneshan,
  • Or Shalom,
  • Terence Tao

摘要

It was conjectured by Bergelson et al. (Geom Funct Anal 19(6):1539–1596, 2010) that every Host–Kra \(\mathbb {F}_p^\omega \) F p ω -system of order k is an Abramov system of order k. This conjecture has been verified for \(k \le p+1\) k p + 1 . In this paper we show that the conjecture fails when \(k=5, p=2\) k = 5 , p = 2 . We in fact establish a stronger (combinatorial) statement, in that we produce a bounded function \(f: \mathbb {F}_2^n \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) f : F 2 n C of large Gowers norm \(\Vert f\Vert _{U^6(\mathbb {F}_2^n)}\) f U 6 ( F 2 n ) which (as per the inverse theorem for that norm) correlates with a non-classical quintic phase polynomial e(P), but with the property that all such phase polynomials e(P) are “non-measurable” in the sense that they cannot be well approximated by functions of a bounded number of random translates of f. A simpler version of our construction can also be used to answer a question of Candela et al. (Ergodic Theory Dyn Syst 43(12):3971–4040, 2023).